Difference between revisions of "Cross-Examination"

From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Background ==
 
== Background ==
 
The goal of this section is to provide a conceptual frame work for the trial attorney to consult regarding development and delivery of a persuasive cross-examination. In common law systems cross-examination is a fundamental right rooted in the defendant's right to confront the accuser.
 
 
Cross-examination is a real live event. Therefore, our ability to anticipate, plan, prepare and practice in advance is crucial to a persuasive presentation.
 
  
 
Cross-examination is the moment in a trial when the defense attorney is permitted to ask questions of the prosecution's witnesses. Through cross-examination, a defense attorney can present their own evidence and develop a theory of the case using government witnesses. Cross-examination is important because it may be the only time/means for you to get before the judge facts, inferences and impressions which are necessary to your theory of the case.
 
Cross-examination is the moment in a trial when the defense attorney is permitted to ask questions of the prosecution's witnesses. Through cross-examination, a defense attorney can present their own evidence and develop a theory of the case using government witnesses. Cross-examination is important because it may be the only time/means for you to get before the judge facts, inferences and impressions which are necessary to your theory of the case.

Revision as of 10:28, 15 June 2010