Difference between revisions of "Procedural defects"
From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchDdemetriou (talk | contribs) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Did the prosecution fail to follow any of these requirements? | * Did the prosecution fail to follow any of these requirements? | ||
* If so, what are the legal consequences of failing to follow that procedure? | * If so, what are the legal consequences of failing to follow that procedure? | ||
− | + | ---- | |
− | + | See [[Defenses]] | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 15:46, 12 November 2010
This procedural defense argues that the prosecution did not follow the required legal procedures with the defendant. The defense lawyer must consider the following:
- What procedures was the prosecution required to follow?
- Did the prosecution fail to follow any of these requirements?
- If so, what are the legal consequences of failing to follow that procedure?
See Defenses