Criminal Justice Systems Around the World: Difference between revisions
From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* Cameroon | * Cameroon | ||
*[[Cambodia]] | *[[Cambodia]] | ||
* Canada | * [[Canada]] | ||
* Central African Republic | * Central African Republic | ||
* Chad | * Chad | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
** French Guiana | ** French Guiana | ||
* Georgia | * Georgia | ||
* | *Germany | ||
</div><div style="float: left; width: 33%"> | </div><div style="float: left; width: 33%"> | ||
Revision as of 12:57, 24 February 2011
Criminal justice systems can be loosely classified as either common, civil, Islamic or socialist law in nature. However, today many jurisdictions have adopted hybrid models that combine elements of various legal systems. Many of these systems share a common set of core values. In addition, most criminal justice systems have adopted a legality principle. Almost every criminal justice system is made of of similar actors.
Country Pages
- Afghanistan
- Algeria
- Angola
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Australia
- Azerbaijan
- Bangladesh
- Belgium
- Benin
- Bolivia
- Brazil
- Brunei
- Burundi
- Cameroon
- Cambodia
- Canada
- Central African Republic
- Chad
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Cyprus
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Ecuador
- Egypt
- El Salvador
- England and Wales
- Ethiopia
- Finland
- France
- French Guiana
- Georgia
- Germany
- Pakistan
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Poland
- Romania
- Rwanda
- Russia
- Saudia Arabia
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Singapore
- South Africa
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
- Suriname
- Swaziland
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Syria
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Trinidad and Tobago
- The Republic of the Philippines
- Turkey
- Uganda
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates
- United States
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Zimbabwe
Other Countries
See a country that is not listed here? Email elearning@ibj.org.
