Calling accused to give evidence (Zimbabwe): Difference between revisions
Ddemetriou (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
If X gives evidence in his defence the prosecutor can cross-examine him and he may also be questioned by the magistrate. | If X gives evidence in his defence the prosecutor can cross-examine him and he may also be questioned by the magistrate. | ||
---- | |||
See [[Zimbabwe | Zimbabwe Criminal Defense Manual]] | |||
Latest revision as of 21:42, 28 June 2010
Defence counsel needs to decide whether X should give testimony in his own defence. Sometimes X's legal representative will decide that it would be inadvisable for X to testify and will advise him accordingly. For example, the State case may be weak and the lawyer may decide that X will make a poor witness and may only end up strengthening the State's case if he is put on the witness stand. As the prosecutor and the judicial officer are entitled to question X even if he elects not to give evidence, it is generally better if X is called to give evidence. If he declines to give evidence, the court's reaction may be to believe that he has something to hide.
If X gives evidence in his defence the prosecutor can cross-examine him and he may also be questioned by the magistrate.