Physical Impossibility: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:16, 8 June 2010

In this type of defense, the lawyer argues that it was physically impossible for the defendant to have committed the crime.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 In this type of defense, the lawyer argues that it was physically impossible for the defendant to have committed the crime.
-== Defenses ==
+See [[Defenses]]
-'''Table of Contents'''
-===Procedural Defenses===
-* [[Double jeopardy]]
-*[[ Statutory Limitation]]
-*[[ Lack of jurisdiction]]
-* [[Entrapment]]
-* [[Procedural defects]]
-* [[Motion to suppress]]
-*[[ Immunity and Public Authority]]
-===Normal Defenses===
-* [[Self-Defense]]
-* [[Defense of others]]
-* [[Defense of property]]
-* [[Mental Incapacity]]
-* [[Alibi]]
-* [[Necessity]]
-* [[Duress]]
-* [[Physical Impossibility]]
-* [[Mistake of Law]]
-* [[Mistake of Fact]]
-* [[Mistake of identity]]
-* [[Consent]]
-* [[Lack of intent]]
-* [[Maltreated Women Syndrome]]
-*[[ Intoxication]]
-* [[Criminal act with Sincere Intent]]