Procedural defects: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
Ddemetriou (talk | contribs)
confirmed
1,272 edits
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
* If so, what are the legal consequences of failing to follow that procedure?
* If so, what are the legal consequences of failing to follow that procedure?


== Defenses ==
See [[Defenses]]
 
'''Table of Contents'''
 
===Procedural Defenses===
* [[Double jeopardy]]
*[[ Statutory Limitation]]
*[[ Lack of jurisdiction]]
* [[Entrapment]]
* [[Procedural defects]]
* [[Motion to suppress]]
*[[ Immunity and Public Authority]]
 
===Normal Defenses===
* [[Self-Defense]]
* [[Defense of others]]
* [[Defense of property]]
* [[Mental Incapacity]]
* [[Alibi]]
* [[Necessity]]
* [[Duress]]
* [[Physical Impossibility]]
* [[Mistake of Law]]
* [[Mistake of Fact]]
* [[Mistake of identity]]
* [[Consent]]
* [[Lack of intent]]
* [[Maltreated Women Syndrome]]
*[[ Intoxication]]
* [[Criminal act with Sincere Intent]]

Revision as of 21:13, 8 June 2010

This procedural defense argues that the prosecution did not follow the required legal procedures with the defendant. The defense lawyer must consider the following:

  • What procedures was the prosecution required to follow?
  • Did the prosecution fail to follow any of these requirements?
  • If so, what are the legal consequences of failing to follow that procedure?

See Defenses

Retrieved from "https://defensewiki.ibj.org/index.php?title=Procedural_defects&oldid=2526"