Proof beyond reasonable doubt (Zimbabwe): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Ddemetriou (talk | contribs)
Created page with 'The State is required to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. Proof beyond reasonable doubt requires more than proof on a balance of probabilities. It is not, �'
 
Ddemetriou (talk | contribs)
(No difference)

Revision as of 10:11, 14 April 2010

The State is required to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. Proof beyond reasonable doubt requires more than proof on a balance of probabilities. It is not, however, proof to an absolute degree of certainty or beyond a shadow of a doubt. Where there is proof beyond reasonable doubt no reasonable doubt will remain as to the guilt of the accused. If a reasonable person would still entertain a reasonable doubt as to whether the accused is guilty, the accused is entitled to be acquitted. Fanciful or remote possibilities do not introduce a reasonable doubt: Isolano 1985 (1) ZLR 62 at 64-65.