Difference between revisions of "Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court"

From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 339: Line 339:
  
 
*3.        The application and interpretation of law pursuant to this article must be consistent with internationally recognized human rights, and be without any adverse distinction founded on grounds such as gender as defined in article 7, paragraph 3, age, race, colour, language, religion or belief, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, wealth, birth or other status.
 
*3.        The application and interpretation of law pursuant to this article must be consistent with internationally recognized human rights, and be without any adverse distinction founded on grounds such as gender as defined in article 7, paragraph 3, age, race, colour, language, religion or belief, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, wealth, birth or other status.
 +
 +
==Part 3: General Principles of Criminal Law==
 +
 +
'''Article 22: Nullum crimen sine lege'''
 +
*1.        A person shall not be criminally responsible under this Statute unless the conduct in question constitutes, at the time it takes place, a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court.
 +
 +
*2.        The definition of a crime shall be strictly construed and shall not be extended by analogy. In case of ambiguity, the definition shall be interpreted in favour of the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted.
 +
 +
*3.        This article shall not affect the characterization of any conduct as criminal under international law independently of this Statute.
 +
 +
'''Article 23: Nulla poena sine lege'''
 +
*A person convicted by the Court may be punished only in accordance with this Statute.
 +
 +
'''Article 24: Non-Retroactivity Ratione Personae"
 +
*1.        No person shall be criminally responsible under this Statute for conduct prior to the entry into force of the Statute.
 +
 +
*2.        In the event of a change in the law applicable to a given case prior to a final judgement, the law more favourable to the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted shall apply.
 +
 +
'''Article 25: Individual Criminal Responsibility'''
 +
*1.        The Court shall have jurisdiction over natural persons pursuant to this Statute.
 +
 +
*2.        A person who commits a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court shall be individually responsible and liable for punishment in accordance with this Statute.
 +
 +
*3.        In accordance with this Statute, a person shall be criminally responsible and liable for punishment for a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court if that person:
 +
(a)    Commits such a crime, whether as an individual, jointly with another or through another person, regardless of whether that other person is criminally responsible;
 +
 +
(b)    Orders, solicits or induces the commission of such a crime which in fact occurs or is attempted;
 +
 +
(c)    For the purpose of facilitating the commission of such a crime, aids, abets or otherwise assists in its commission or its attempted commission, including providing the means for its commission;
 +
 +
(d)    In any other way contributes to the commission or attempted commission of such a crime by a group of persons acting with a common purpose. Such contribution shall be intentional and shall either:
 +
*(i)    Be made with the aim of furthering the criminal activity or criminal purpose of the group, where such activity or purpose involves the commission of a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court; or
 +
*(ii)    Be made in the knowledge of the intention of the group to commit the crime;
 +
     
 +
(e)    In respect of the crime of genocide, directly and publicly incites others to commit genocide;
 +
 +
(f)    Attempts to commit such a crime by taking action that commences its execution by means of a substantial step, but the crime does not occur because of circumstances independent of the person's intentions. However, a person who abandons the effort to commit the crime or otherwise prevents the completion of the crime shall not be liable for punishment under this Statute for the attempt to commit that crime if that person completely and voluntarily gave up the criminal purpose.
 +
 +
*4.        No provision in this Statute relating to individual criminal responsibility shall affect the responsibility of States under international law.
 +
 +
'''Article 26: Exclusion of Jurisdiction Over Persons Under Eighteen'''
 +
 +
The Court shall have no jurisdiction over any person who was under the age of 18 at the time of the alleged commission of a crime.
 +
 +
'''Article 27: Irrelevance of Official Capacity'''
 +
*1.        This Statute shall apply equally to all persons without any distinction based on official capacity. In particular, official capacity as a Head of State or Government, a member of a Government or parliament, an elected representative or a government official shall in no case exempt a person from criminal responsibility under this Statute, nor shall it, in and of itself, constitute a ground for reduction of sentence.
 +
*2.        Immunities or special procedural rules which may attach to the official capacity of a person, whether under national or international law, shall not bar the Court from exercising its jurisdiction over such a person.
 +
 +
'''Article 28: Responsibility of Commanders and Other Superiors'''
 +
In addition to other grounds of criminal responsibility under this Statute for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court:
 +
 +
(a)    A military commander or person effectively acting as a military commander shall be criminally responsible for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court committed by forces under his or her effective command and control, or effective authority and control as the case may be, as a result of his or her failure to exercise control properly over such forces, where:     
 +
*(i)    That military commander or person either knew or, owing to the circumstances at the time, should have known that the forces were committing or about to commit such crimes; and
 +
*(ii)    That military commander or person failed to take all necessary and reasonable measures within his or her power to prevent or repress their commission or to submit the matter to the competent authorities for investigation and prosecution.
 +
           
 +
(b)    With respect to superior and subordinate relationships not described in paragraph (a), a superior shall be criminally responsible for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court committed by subordinates under his or her effective authority and control, as a result of his or her failure to exercise control properly over such subordinates, where:
 +
*(i)    The superior either knew, or consciously disregarded information which clearly indicated, that the subordinates were committing or about to commit such crimes;
 +
*(ii)    The crimes concerned activities that were within the effective responsibility and control of the superior; and
 +
*(iii)    The superior failed to take all necessary and reasonable measures within his or her power to prevent or repress their commission or to submit the matter to the competent authorities for investigation and prosecution.
 +
 +
'''Article 29: Non-Applicability of Statute of Limitations'''
 +
*The crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court shall not be subject to any statute of limitations.
 +
 +
 +
'''Article 30: Mental Element'''
 +
*1.        Unless otherwise provided, a person shall be criminally responsible and liable for punishment for a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court only if the material elements are committed with intent and knowledge.
 +
 +
*2.        For the purposes of this article, a person has intent where:
 +
(a)    In relation to conduct, that person means to engage in the conduct;
 +
 +
(b)    In relation to a consequence, that person means to cause that consequence or is aware that it will occur in the ordinary course of events.
 +
 +
*3.        For the purposes of this article, "knowledge" means awareness that a circumstance exists or a consequence will occur in the ordinary course of events. "Know" and "knowingly" shall be construed accordingly.
 +
 +
"Article 31: Grounds for Excluding Criminal Responsibility"
 +
*1.        In addition to other grounds for excluding criminal responsibility provided for in this Statute, a person shall not be criminally responsible if, at the time of that person's conduct:
 +
 +
(a)    The person suffers from a mental disease or defect that destroys that person's capacity to appreciate the unlawfulness or nature of his or her conduct, or capacity to control his or her conduct to conform to the requirements of law;
 +
 +
(b)    The person is in a state of intoxication that destroys that person's capacity to appreciate the unlawfulness or nature of his or her conduct, or capacity to control his or her conduct to conform to the requirements of law, unless the person has become voluntarily intoxicated under such circumstances that the person knew, or disregarded the risk, that, as a result of the intoxication, he or she was likely to engage in conduct constituting a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
 +
 +
(c)    The person acts reasonably to defend himself or herself or another person or, in the case of war crimes, property which is essential for the survival of the person or another person or property which is essential for accomplishing a military mission, against an imminent and unlawful use of force in a manner proportionate to the degree of danger to the person or the other person or property protected. The fact that the person was involved in a defensive operation conducted by forces shall not in itself constitute a ground for excluding criminal responsibility under this subparagraph;
 +
 +
(d)    The conduct which is alleged to constitute a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been caused by duress resulting from a threat of imminent death or of continuing or imminent serious bodily harm against that person or another person, and the person acts necessarily and reasonably to avoid this threat, provided that the person does not intend to cause a greater harm than the one sought to be avoided. Such a threat may either be:
 +
*(i)    Made by other persons; or
 +
*(ii)    Constituted by other circumstances beyond that person's control.
 +
 +
*2.        The Court shall determine the applicability of the grounds for excluding criminal responsibility provided for in this Statute to the case before it.
 +
 +
*3.        At trial, the Court may consider a ground for excluding criminal responsibility other than those referred to in paragraph 1 where such a ground is derived from applicable law as set forth in article 21. The procedures relating to the consideration of such a ground shall be provided for in the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.
 +
 +
 +
'''Article 32: Mistake of Fact or Mistake of Law'''
 +
*1.        A mistake of fact shall be a ground for excluding criminal responsibility only if it negates the mental element required by the crime.
 +
 +
*2.        A mistake of law as to whether a particular type of conduct is a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court shall not be a ground for excluding criminal responsibility. A mistake of law may, however, be a ground for excluding criminal responsibility if it negates the mental element required by such a crime, or as provided for in article 33.
 +
 +
'''Article 33: Superior Orders and Prescription of Law'''
 +
 +
*1.        The fact that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been committed by a person pursuant to an order of a Government or of a superior, whether military or civilian, shall not relieve that person of criminal responsibility unless:
 +
(a)    The person was under a legal obligation to obey orders of the Government or the superior in question;
 +
 +
(b)    The person did not know that the order was unlawful; and
 +
 +
(c)    The order was not manifestly unlawful.
 +
 +
*2.        For the purposes of this article, orders to commit genocide or crimes against humanity are manifestly unlawful.
 +
 +
==Part4:==

Revision as of 15:12, 1 June 2010