Difference between revisions of "Priest-Penitent Privilege"

From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
The first US state to recognize the Priest-Penitent privilege by statute was New York.  New York's statute originally provided that, "No minister of the gospel, or priest of any denomination whatsoever, shall be allowed to disclose any confessions made to him in his professional character, in the course of discipline enjoined by the rules of practice of such a denomination."  
 
The first US state to recognize the Priest-Penitent privilege by statute was New York.  New York's statute originally provided that, "No minister of the gospel, or priest of any denomination whatsoever, shall be allowed to disclose any confessions made to him in his professional character, in the course of discipline enjoined by the rules of practice of such a denomination."  
 +
 +
The People v. Phillips (New York 1813), the court articulated a basis for the privilege:
 +
<blockquote>It is essential to the free exercise of a religion, that its ordinances should be administered-that its ceremonies as well as its essentials should be protected. Secrecy is of the essence of penance. The sinner will not confess, nor will the priest receive his confession, if the veil of secrecy is removed: To decide that the minister shall promulgate what he receives in confession, is to declare that there shall be no penance.</blockquote>
  
  
Line 79: Line 82:
 
Citing Chambers v. Mississippi, Judge Chin concluded that if due process was at risk, the testimony could be admissible if it was "vital" to the defense, even if it was hearsay as long as it bore sufficient indicia of reliability. Because Fornes had repeated the confession four times to different parties, it had a high level of reliability.
 
Citing Chambers v. Mississippi, Judge Chin concluded that if due process was at risk, the testimony could be admissible if it was "vital" to the defense, even if it was hearsay as long as it bore sufficient indicia of reliability. Because Fornes had repeated the confession four times to different parties, it had a high level of reliability.
  
==Rule 505 of Uniform Rules of Evidence==
+
==Federal Rules of Evidence 506 - Communications to Clergymen==
Rule 505 of the Uniform Rules of Evidence, which has been adopted by several states, provides:
+
 
 +
[Not Enacted.]
 +
 
 +
(a) Definitions. As used in this rule:
 +
 
 +
(1) A "clergyman" is a minister, priest, rabbi, or other similar functionary of a religious organization, or an individual reasonably believed so to be by the person consulting him.
  
    (a) Definitions. As used in this rule:
+
(2) A communication is "confidential" if made privately and not intended for further disclosure except to other persons present in furtherance of the purpose of the communication.
  
    (1) A "clergyman" is a minister, priest, rabbi, accredited Christian Science Practitioner, or other similar functionary of a religious organization, or an individual reasonably believed so to be by the person consulting him.  
+
(b) General rule of privilege. A person has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent another from disclosing a confidential communication by the person to a clergyman in his professional characters as a spiritual adviser.
  
    (2) A communication is "confidential" if made privately and not intended for further disclosure except to other persons present in furtherance of the purpose of the communication.  
+
(c) Who may claim the privilege. The privilege may be claimed by the person, by his guardian or conservator, or by his personal representative if he is deceased. The clergyman may claim the privilege on behalf of the person. His authority so to do is presumed in the absence of evidence to the contrary.
  
    (b) General Rule of Privilege. A person has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent another from disclosing a confidential communication by the person to the clergyman in his professional character as a spiritual adviser.
+
----
 +
See [[Evidence]]
  
    (c) Who May Claim the Privilege. The privilege may be claimed by the person, by his guardian or conservator, or by his personal representative if he is deceased. The person who was the clergyman at the time of the communication is presumed to have authority to claim the privilege but only on behalf of the communicant.
+
==References==
 +
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priest-penitent_privilege_in_England Priest Penitent Privilege in England]

Latest revision as of 10:22, 27 July 2010