Difference between revisions of "Physician-Patient Privilege"

From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 80: Line 80:
 
Like the UK, testimonial compulsion is applicable.<ref>Medical Professional secrecy with Special Reference to Venereal Diseases, Bernfeld, British Journal of Venereal Disease 43, 53 (1967).</ref>  National Health Act section 14-  
 
Like the UK, testimonial compulsion is applicable.<ref>Medical Professional secrecy with Special Reference to Venereal Diseases, Bernfeld, British Journal of Venereal Disease 43, 53 (1967).</ref>  National Health Act section 14-  
 
#All information concerning a user, including information relating to his or her health status, treatment or stay in a health establishment, is confidential.
 
#All information concerning a user, including information relating to his or her health status, treatment or stay in a health establishment, is confidential.
#Subject to section 15, no person may disclose any information contemplated in subsection (1) unless:
+
#Subject to section 15, no person may disclose any information contemplated in subsection (1) unless:a. The user consents to that disclosure in writing; b. A court order or any other law requires that disclosure; or c. Non-disclosure of the information represents a serious threat to public heath. <ref>Ethics roundtable debate: Is a physician-patient confidentiality relationship subservient to a greater good? Arthur Morgan, Critical Care 25 April 2005.</ref>
      a. The user consents to that disclosure in writing;
 
      b. A court order or any other law requires that disclosure; or
 
      c. Non-disclosure of the information represents a serious threat to public heath. <ref>Ethics roundtable debate: Is a physician-patient confidentiality relationship subservient to a greater good? Arthur Morgan, Critical Care 25 April 2005.</ref>
 
  
 
----
 
----

Revision as of 14:27, 4 October 2010