Difference between revisions of "Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 411. Liability Insurance"

From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with '==The Rule== Evidence that a person was or was not insured against liability is not admissible upon the issue whether the person acted negligently or otherwise wrongfully. This �')
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Evidence that a person was or was not insured against liability is not admissible upon the issue whether the person acted negligently or otherwise wrongfully. This rule does not require the exclusion of evidence of insurance against liability when offered for another purpose, such as proof of agency, ownership, or control, or bias or prejudice of a witness.
 
Evidence that a person was or was not insured against liability is not admissible upon the issue whether the person acted negligently or otherwise wrongfully. This rule does not require the exclusion of evidence of insurance against liability when offered for another purpose, such as proof of agency, ownership, or control, or bias or prejudice of a witness.
 +
 +
----
 +
See [[Federal Rules of Evidence]]

Latest revision as of 16:38, 6 August 2010

The Rule

Evidence that a person was or was not insured against liability is not admissible upon the issue whether the person acted negligently or otherwise wrongfully. This rule does not require the exclusion of evidence of insurance against liability when offered for another purpose, such as proof of agency, ownership, or control, or bias or prejudice of a witness.


See Federal Rules of Evidence