Difference between revisions of "Ex Post Facto Punishment"

From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
**Parliament shall not pass any law to alter the decision or judgment of any court as between the parties to the decision or judgment.
 
**Parliament shall not pass any law to alter the decision or judgment of any court as between the parties to the decision or judgment.
  
== Rights of the accused ==
 
  
'''Table of Contents'''
+
----
 
+
See [[Rights of the Accused]]
===Rights with Police ===
 
* [[Arrest]]
 
* [[Right to Silence]]
 
* [[Search and Seizure]]
 
* [[Right to Counsel]]
 
* [[Confessions]]
 
* [[Pretrial Identification]]
 
 
 
===Rights at Detention===
 
* [[Right to Counsel]]
 
* [[Right to Habeas Corpus]]
 
* [[Right to be free of punishment]]
 
* Right to medical care
 
 
 
===Rights at Trial===
 
* [[Right to a Fair Trial]]
 
* [[Right to Notice of Charges]]
 
* Right to Trial by Jury
 
* [[Right to Compulsory Process]]
 
* [[Right to Confront Witnesses]]
 
* [[Right to a Speedy Trial]]
 
* [[Right to Counsel (Trial)| Right to Counsel]]
 
* [[Presumption of Innocence]]
 
* [[Double Jeopardy]]
 
 
 
===Sentencing===
 
 
 
* Right to sentence free of torture
 
* [[Right to sentence without cruel or unusual punishment]]
 
* [[Death Sentence]]
 
* Right to fines that are not excessive
 
* [[Ex Post Facto Punishment]]
 
* [[Right to Appeal]]
 
 
 
===Rights in Prison===
 

Latest revision as of 22:29, 8 June 2010

Background

For a system to be fair to all parties, it must have the essential element of finality. The rule against Ex Post Facto punishment is rooted in the theory that a defendant must be given notice of the punishment in order for due process to have taken place. Therefore, a defendant may not be retro-actively punished and any legislation that occurs after the offense can not be used against the defendant.

In certain cases a court may determine that a piece of legislation that has ex post facto effects, does not violate this principle if the effects are regulatory and not punitive in nature.

International Sources

International Covenent on Civil and Political Rights, Article 14, Section 7- "No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again for an offence for which he has already been finally convicted or acquitted in accordance with the law and penal procedure of each country."


Examples of Prohibitions on Ex Post Facto Punishment

United States

"No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."- Article I, section 9, US Constitution.

Uganda

Constitution

  • 92. Restriction on retrospective legislation.
    • Parliament shall not pass any law to alter the decision or judgment of any court as between the parties to the decision or judgment.



See Rights of the Accused