Difference between revisions of "Cross-Examination"
From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 88: | Line 88: | ||
== Pitfalls of Cross-Examination == | == Pitfalls of Cross-Examination == | ||
− | + | Using compound or long questions can be | |
Do not repeat good questions that receive good answers. Defense attorneys will often want to do this to emphasize a surprising answer that is beneficial to their case. However, repeating the question only gives the witness an opportunity to change or explain their answer. | Do not repeat good questions that receive good answers. Defense attorneys will often want to do this to emphasize a surprising answer that is beneficial to their case. However, repeating the question only gives the witness an opportunity to change or explain their answer. | ||
− | As a general rule, a defense attorney should never ask a question when he or she doesn't already know the answer. However, under certain circumstances, a defense attorney may ask a closed-ended question | + | As a general rule, a defense attorney should never ask a question when he or she doesn't already know the answer. However, under certain circumstances, a defense attorney may ask a closed-ended question, even if he does not know the answer. Such questions are sometimes called "No Lose Questions" because the answer will not break the case. For example, when cross-examining a police officer about the report he made at the scene, you might ask, "You wanted to get the most accurate information possible?" |
== Transitions and Looping Techniques == | == Transitions and Looping Techniques == |