Difference between revisions of "Cross-Examination"

From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Background ==
 
== Background ==
  
Cross-examination is the moment in a trial when the defense attorney is permitted to ask questions of the prosecution's witnesses. Through cross-examination, a defense attorney can present their own evidence and develop a theory of the case using government witnesses. Cross-examination is important because it may be the only time/means for the criminal defense attorney to get before the judge facts, inferences, and impressions which are necessary to the defendant's [[Theory of the Case | theory of the case]].
+
Cross-examination is an opportunity for the defense attorney to question the prosecution's witnesses during a trial. Through cross-examination, a defense attorney can present their own evidence and develop a theory of the case using government witnesses. Cross-examination is important because it may be the only time/means for the criminal defense attorney to get before the judge facts, inferences, and impressions which are necessary to the defendant's [[Theory of the Case | theory of the case]].
  
 
[[Direct Examination | Direct examination]] and cross-examination have very different purposes and techniques. Direct examination requires the witness to tell a story.  The goal of direct examination is for the criminal defender to elicit the witness's story in the witness's own words in a manner that will advance the overall theory of the case.   
 
[[Direct Examination | Direct examination]] and cross-examination have very different purposes and techniques. Direct examination requires the witness to tell a story.  The goal of direct examination is for the criminal defender to elicit the witness's story in the witness's own words in a manner that will advance the overall theory of the case.   

Revision as of 15:33, 16 June 2010