Difference between revisions of "Criminal Justice Systems Around the World"
From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
* Serbia | * Serbia | ||
* Sierra Leone | * Sierra Leone | ||
| + | * [[Singapore]] | ||
* [[South Africa]] | * [[South Africa]] | ||
*[[Sri Lanka]] | *[[Sri Lanka]] | ||
| Line 97: | Line 98: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Other Countries== | ==Other Countries== | ||
See a country that is not listed here? Email elearning@ibj.org. | See a country that is not listed here? Email elearning@ibj.org. | ||
Revision as of 13:19, 2 February 2011
Criminal justice systems can be loosely classified as either common, civil, Islamic or socialist law in nature. However, today many jurisdictions have adopted hybrid models that combine elements of various legal systems. Many of these systems share a common set of core values. In addition, most criminal justice systems have adopted a legality principle. Almost every criminal justice system is made of of similar actors.
Country Pages
- Afghanistan
- Algeria
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Australia
- Azerbaijan
- Bangladesh
- Belgium
- Benin
- Bolivia
- Brazil
- Brunei
- Burundi
- Cameroon
- Cambodia
- Canada
- Central African Republic
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Ecuador
- Egypt
- El Salvador
- Ethiopia
- France
- French Guiana
- Georgia
- North Korea
- Pakistan
- Paraguay
- Rwanda
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Singapore
- South Africa
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
- Suriname
- Swaziland
- Switzerland
- Syria
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Trinidad and Tobago
- The Republic of the Philippines
- Uganda
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Uruguay
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Zimbabwe
Other Countries
See a country that is not listed here? Email elearning@ibj.org.
