https://defensewiki.ibj.org/index.php?title=Bifurcated_Proceedings&feed=atom&action=historyBifurcated Proceedings - Revision history2024-03-29T00:36:51ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1https://defensewiki.ibj.org/index.php?title=Bifurcated_Proceedings&diff=9070&oldid=prevDurankar at 14:43, 16 February 20112011-02-16T14:43:36Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 14:43, 16 February 2011</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some criminal courts, courts may separate the trial into two separate parts which have separate factfinding missions. These are sometimes referred to as bifurcated proceedings. For instance, in the United States, death penalty cases are typically bifurcated proceedings. In the first proceeding, the factfinder determines whether the defendant is guilty of the crime while in the second proceeding, the factfinder determines whether to recommend capital punishment. Cases involving [[Habitual Offender Statutes| habitual offender statutes]] also sometimes have bifurcated proceedings in which the factfinder first determines guilt and later determines whether the defendant is a "habitual offender"</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some criminal courts, courts may separate the trial into two separate parts which have separate factfinding missions. These are sometimes referred to as bifurcated proceedings. For instance, in the United States, death penalty cases are typically bifurcated proceedings. In the first proceeding, the factfinder determines whether the defendant is guilty of the crime while in the second proceeding, the factfinder determines whether to recommend capital punishment. Cases involving [[Habitual Offender Statutes| habitual offender statutes]] also sometimes have bifurcated proceedings in which the factfinder first determines guilt and later determines whether the defendant is a "habitual offender<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">.</ins>"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some jurisdictions the defense of [[Mental Incapacity|mental disease or defect]] will trigger bifurcated proceedings.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some jurisdictions the defense of [[Mental Incapacity|mental disease or defect]] will trigger bifurcated proceedings.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>----See [[Sentencing]]</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>----See [[Sentencing]]</div></td></tr>
</table>Durankarhttps://defensewiki.ibj.org/index.php?title=Bifurcated_Proceedings&diff=8576&oldid=prevIbjadmin at 21:36, 20 January 20112011-01-20T21:36:25Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 21:36, 20 January 2011</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some criminal courts, courts may separate the trial into two separate parts which have separate factfinding missions. These are sometimes referred to as bifurcated proceedings. For instance, in the United States, death penalty cases are typically bifurcated proceedings. In the first proceeding, the factfinder determines whether the defendant is guilty of the crime while in the second proceeding, the factfinder determines whether to recommend capital punishment. Cases involving [[Habitual Offender Statutes| habitual offender statutes]] also sometimes have bifurcated proceedings in which the factfinder first determines guilt and later determines whether the defendant is a "habitual offender"</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some criminal courts, courts may separate the trial into two separate parts which have separate factfinding missions. These are sometimes referred to as bifurcated proceedings. For instance, in the United States, death penalty cases are typically bifurcated proceedings. In the first proceeding, the factfinder determines whether the defendant is guilty of the crime while in the second proceeding, the factfinder determines whether to recommend capital punishment. Cases involving [[Habitual Offender Statutes| habitual offender statutes]] also sometimes have bifurcated proceedings in which the factfinder first determines guilt and later determines whether the defendant is a "habitual offender"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some jurisdictions the defense of [[Mental Incapacity|mental disease or defect]] will trigger bifurcated proceedings.----See [[Sentencing]]</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> </div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some jurisdictions the defense of [[Mental Incapacity|mental disease or defect]] will trigger bifurcated proceedings.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> </div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>----See [[Sentencing]]</div></td></tr>
</table>Ibjadminhttps://defensewiki.ibj.org/index.php?title=Bifurcated_Proceedings&diff=8575&oldid=prevIbjadmin at 21:36, 20 January 20112011-01-20T21:36:07Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 21:36, 20 January 2011</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some criminal courts, courts may separate the trial into two separate parts which have separate factfinding missions. These are sometimes referred to as bifurcated proceedings. For instance, in the United States, <del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">[[Death Penalty | </del>death penalty<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">]] </del>cases are typically bifurcated proceedings. In the first proceeding, the factfinder determines whether the defendant is guilty of the crime while in the second proceeding, the factfinder determines whether to recommend capital punishment. Cases involving [[Habitual Offender Statutes| habitual offender statutes]] also sometimes have bifurcated proceedings in which the factfinder first determines guilt and later determines whether the defendant is a "habitual offender"</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some criminal courts, courts may separate the trial into two separate parts which have separate factfinding missions. These are sometimes referred to as bifurcated proceedings. For instance, in the United States, death penalty cases are typically bifurcated proceedings. In the first proceeding, the factfinder determines whether the defendant is guilty of the crime while in the second proceeding, the factfinder determines whether to recommend capital punishment. Cases involving [[Habitual Offender Statutes| habitual offender statutes]] also sometimes have bifurcated proceedings in which the factfinder first determines guilt and later determines whether the defendant is a "habitual offender"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some jurisdictions the defense of [[Mental Incapacity|mental disease or defect]] will trigger bifurcated proceedings.----See [[Sentencing]]</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some jurisdictions the defense of [[Mental Incapacity|mental disease or defect]] will trigger bifurcated proceedings.----See [[Sentencing]]</div></td></tr>
</table>Ibjadminhttps://defensewiki.ibj.org/index.php?title=Bifurcated_Proceedings&diff=8574&oldid=prevIbjadmin at 21:35, 20 January 20112011-01-20T21:35:02Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 21:35, 20 January 2011</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some criminal courts, courts may separate the trial into two separate parts which have separate factfinding missions. These are sometimes referred to as bifurcated proceedings. For instance, in the United States, [[Death Penalty | death penalty]] cases are typically bifurcated proceedings. In the first proceeding, the factfinder determines whether the defendant is guilty of the crime while in the second proceeding, the factfinder determines whether to recommend capital punishment. Cases involving [[Habitual Offender Statutes| habitual offender statutes]] also sometimes have bifurcated proceedings in which the factfinder first determines guilt and later determines whether the defendant is a "habitual offender"</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some criminal courts, courts may separate the trial into two separate parts which have separate factfinding missions. These are sometimes referred to as bifurcated proceedings. For instance, in the United States, [[Death Penalty | death penalty]] cases are typically bifurcated proceedings. In the first proceeding, the factfinder determines whether the defendant is guilty of the crime while in the second proceeding, the factfinder determines whether to recommend capital punishment. Cases involving [[Habitual Offender Statutes| habitual offender statutes]] also sometimes have bifurcated proceedings in which the factfinder first determines guilt and later determines whether the defendant is a "habitual offender"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some jurisdictions the defense of [[Mental Incapacity|mental disease or defect]] will trigger bifurcated proceedings.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In some jurisdictions the defense of [[Mental Incapacity|mental disease or defect]] will trigger bifurcated proceedings.<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">----</ins>See [[Sentencing]]</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>See [[Sentencing]]</div></td><td colspan="2"> </td></tr>
</table>Ibjadminhttps://defensewiki.ibj.org/index.php?title=Bifurcated_Proceedings&diff=8573&oldid=prevIbjadmin: Created page with "In some criminal courts, courts may separate the trial into two separate parts which have separate factfinding missions. These are sometimes referred to as bifurcated proceedings..."2011-01-20T21:34:51Z<p>Created page with "In some criminal courts, courts may separate the trial into two separate parts which have separate factfinding missions. These are sometimes referred to as bifurcated proceedings..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>In some criminal courts, courts may separate the trial into two separate parts which have separate factfinding missions. These are sometimes referred to as bifurcated proceedings. For instance, in the United States, [[Death Penalty | death penalty]] cases are typically bifurcated proceedings. In the first proceeding, the factfinder determines whether the defendant is guilty of the crime while in the second proceeding, the factfinder determines whether to recommend capital punishment. Cases involving [[Habitual Offender Statutes| habitual offender statutes]] also sometimes have bifurcated proceedings in which the factfinder first determines guilt and later determines whether the defendant is a "habitual offender"<br />
In some jurisdictions the defense of [[Mental Incapacity|mental disease or defect]] will trigger bifurcated proceedings.<br />
See [[Sentencing]]</div>Ibjadmin