Difference between revisions of "Actus Reus (Voluntary Act)"

From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
== What Acts Are Not ==
 
== What Acts Are Not ==
Acts do not include, thoughts, words, possession and status. Thoughts alone can never be punished as crimes. Lawmakers are hesitant to impose controls on what people may think, and such laws would also present profound problems of proof and enforcement
+
Acts do not include thoughts, words, possession and status.  
 +
*Thoughts alone can never be punished as crimes. Lawmakers are hesitant to impose controls on what people may think, and such laws would also present profound problems of proof and enforcement.
 +
*Words usually cannot constitute acts. However, depending on the jurisdiction and the crime, an agreement to commit a crime may be enough to constitute conspiracy, and words of encouragement may constitute aiding and abetting a crime.
  
 
== Sources ==
 
== Sources ==
 
Criminal Law, Emanuel Law Outline, Aspen Publishers, 2000
 
Criminal Law, Emanuel Law Outline, Aspen Publishers, 2000

Revision as of 10:08, 16 June 2010

'Actus Reus' refers to the requirement that the defendant have carried out a voluntary act in furtherance of the crime. It is important to distinguish such acts from thoughts, words, states of possession, or status; involuntary acts; and omissions.

What Acts Are Not

Acts do not include thoughts, words, possession and status.

  • Thoughts alone can never be punished as crimes. Lawmakers are hesitant to impose controls on what people may think, and such laws would also present profound problems of proof and enforcement.
  • Words usually cannot constitute acts. However, depending on the jurisdiction and the crime, an agreement to commit a crime may be enough to constitute conspiracy, and words of encouragement may constitute aiding and abetting a crime.

Sources

Criminal Law, Emanuel Law Outline, Aspen Publishers, 2000