Jury/es - Revision history

Cielo.linares at 15:34, 8 May 2012

2012-05-08T15:34:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:34, 8 May 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Académicamente se ha demostrado que el juicio por jurado beneficia a la sociedad ya que es el único medio en el cual el gobierno pone el poder directamente en las manos de los ciudadanos. En muchos países del common law, este sistema es viste como un límite increbantable al poder del estado, lo que es particularmente importante en países, como los EEUU, donde el fiscal tiene muchos poderes.		Académicamente se ha demostrado que el juicio por jurado beneficia a la sociedad ya que es el único medio en el cual el gobierno pone el poder directamente en las manos de los ciudadanos. En muchos países del common law, este sistema es viste como un límite increbantable al poder del estado, lo que es particularmente importante en países, como los EEUU, donde el fiscal tiene muchos poderes.
	Por otro lado, las críticas a este sistema argumenta que los jurados no tienen la posibilidad de entender los conceptos jurídicos, de por sí sofisticados, y que son fácilmente influenciables por prejuicios.		Por otro lado, las críticas a este sistema argumenta que los jurados no tienen la posibilidad de entender los conceptos jurídicos, de por sí sofisticados, y que son fácilmente influenciables por prejuicios.


	==Anulación por Jurado==		==Anulación por Jurado==

Cielo.linares: /* Referencias */

2012-05-08T15:33:30Z

Referencias

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:33, 8 May 2012
Line 15:		Line 15:

	==Referencias==		==Referencias==
	<references>		<references/>
	----		----

	Ver [[Actors in the Criminal Justice System/es \| sujetos procesales]] y [[Trial/es\|juicio]]		Ver [[Actors in the Criminal Justice System/es \| sujetos procesales]] y [[Trial/es\|juicio]]

Cielo.linares at 15:32, 8 May 2012

2012-05-08T15:32:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:32, 8 May 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Previo a la guerra civil, los jurados solía rechazar condenar a una persona por violaciones a la ley de esclavo fugitivo. Durante la prohibición, el jurado solía absolver a quienes violaban la enmienda 19. También ocurrieron cuando un jurado de blancos se negaba a condenar a otro blanco por el asesinado a un negro.		Previo a la guerra civil, los jurados solía rechazar condenar a una persona por violaciones a la ley de esclavo fugitivo. Durante la prohibición, el jurado solía absolver a quienes violaban la enmienda 19. También ocurrieron cuando un jurado de blancos se negaba a condenar a otro blanco por el asesinado a un negro.


			==Referencias==
			<references>
	----		----

	Ver [[Actors in the Criminal Justice System/es \| sujetos procesales]] y [[Trial/es\|juicio]]		Ver [[Actors in the Criminal Justice System/es \| sujetos procesales]] y [[Trial/es\|juicio]]

Cielo.linares at 15:30, 8 May 2012

2012-05-08T15:30:39Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Languages|Jury}}
-A jury is a body of lay people who act as factfinders during a criminal [[Trial/es | juicio]]. In some cases the jury may also act both finders of fact and finders of law. <ref>Indiana Constitution,Section 19 ("In all criminal cases whatever, the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the facts.")</ref>
+El jurado es un grupo de legos civiles que juzga los hechos durante un [[Trial/es | juicio]] penal. En algunas cosas también analizan cuestiones de derechos, como por ejemplo en Indiana, EEUU <ref>Indiana Constitution,Sección 19</ref>
 ----
 Ver [[Actors in the Criminal Justice System/es | sujetos procesales]] y [[Trial/es|juicio]]

Cielo.linares at 15:05, 8 May 2012

2012-05-08T15:05:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:05, 8 May 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Languages\|Jury}}		{{Languages\|Jury}}

	A jury is a body of lay people who act as factfinders during a criminal [[Trial \| ~~trial~~]]. In some cases the jury may also act both finders of fact and finders of law. <ref>Indiana Constitution,Section 19 ("In all criminal cases whatever, the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the facts.")</ref>		A jury is a body of lay people who act as factfinders during a criminal [[Trial/es \| juicio]]. In some cases the jury may also act both finders of fact and finders of law. <ref>Indiana Constitution,Section 19 ("In all criminal cases whatever, the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the facts.")</ref>

	Jury trials may occur in both adversarial and civil law countries including Britain, [[United States]], Brazil, Canada, Australia, France and Germany.		Jury trials may occur in both adversarial and civil law countries including Britain, [[United States]], Brazil, Canada, Australia, France and Germany.

Cielo.linares: /* Jury Nullification */

2012-05-08T15:03:42Z

Jury Nullification

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, 8 May 2012
Line 22:		Line 22:
	----		----

	Ver [[~~Sistemas de Justicia Penal~~]], [[Trial/es\|~~Juicio~~]]		Ver [[Actors in the Criminal Justice System/es \| sujetos procesales]] y [[Trial/es\|juicio]]

	==Referencias==		==Referencias==
	<references/>		<references/>

Cielo.linares: /* Jury Nullification */

2012-05-08T15:01:17Z

Jury Nullification

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:01, 8 May 2012
Line 22:		Line 22:
	----		----

	Ver [[Sistemas de Justicia Penal]], [[Trial/es]]		Ver [[Sistemas de Justicia Penal]], [[Trial/es\|Juicio]]

	==Referencias==		==Referencias==
	<references/>		<references/>

Cielo.linares: Created page with "{{Languages|Jury}} A jury is a body of lay people who act as factfinders during a criminal trial. In some cases the jury may also act both finders of fact and finder..."

2012-05-08T15:00:39Z

Created page with "{{Languages|Jury}} A jury is a body of lay people who act as factfinders during a criminal trial. In some cases the jury may also act both finders of fact and finder..."

New page

{{Languages|Jury}}

A jury is a body of lay people who act as factfinders during a criminal [[Trial | trial]]. In some cases the jury may also act both finders of fact and finders of law. <ref>Indiana Constitution,Section 19 ("In all criminal cases whatever, the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the facts.")</ref>

Jury trials may occur in both adversarial and civil law countries including Britain, [[United States]], Brazil, Canada, Australia, France and Germany.

Academics have concluded that the jury system benefits society because it is the only means by which the government puts power directly into citizens' hands. In many common law countries, the jury system is seen as a way to limit unbridled government power. This is particularly important in countries like the United States which grant prosecutors wide-ranging powers. For other countries, the jury trial may provide their only opportunity to learn about governance outside of formal schooling.

On the other side, critics of the jury system contend that juries cannot possibly understand sophisticated legal concepts and that they are easily swayed by prejudice or bias. In common law systems this belief has lead to the creation of complex rules of evidence intended to keep certain types of prejudicial evidence from the jury.

==Jury Nullification==

Jury nullification occurs when a jury chooses to acquit an individual even though evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt that they committed the crime.

Even in jurisdictions where jury's are restricted to fact-finding, the phenomenon of jury nullification is both documented and accepted as generally constitutional.

Examples of jury nullification throughout history:

In pre-Civil War United States, juries sometimes refused to convict defendants for violations of the Fugitive Slave Act. During prohibition, juries sometimes refused to convict defendants for violating the 19th Amendment. Jury nullification may also have occurred throughout the history of the United States when all-white juries failed to convict white individuals being tried for the murder of African-Americans.

----

Ver [[Sistemas de Justicia Penal]], [[Trial/es]]

==Referencias==
<references/>