Difference between revisions of "Right to Habeas Corpus"
From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
#It is necessary to bring him into court to testify or for trial. | #It is necessary to bring him into court to testify or for trial. | ||
| − | The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 limited the use of the federal writ by imposing several requirements on the defendant | + | The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 limited the use of the federal writ by imposing several requirements on the defendant. |
# The AEDPA limited habeas corpus actions by the creation of a one-year statute of limitations | # The AEDPA limited habeas corpus actions by the creation of a one-year statute of limitations | ||
# The AEDPA limited the power of federal judges to grant relief unless the state court's adjudication of the claim resulted in a decision that was (1) contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceeding. It generally but not absolutely barred second or successive petitions, with several exceptions. Petitioners who had already filed a federal habeas petition were required first to secure authorization from the appropriate United States Court of Appeals, to ensure that such an exception was at least facially made out. These new requirements are complex in nature and are still being litigated throughout the United States. | # The AEDPA limited the power of federal judges to grant relief unless the state court's adjudication of the claim resulted in a decision that was (1) contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceeding. It generally but not absolutely barred second or successive petitions, with several exceptions. Petitioners who had already filed a federal habeas petition were required first to secure authorization from the appropriate United States Court of Appeals, to ensure that such an exception was at least facially made out. These new requirements are complex in nature and are still being litigated throughout the United States. | ||
