Justification and Excuse

From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

The common law as well as the Model Penal Code classifies defenses as either justifications or excuses.

The difference between justification and excuse is explained in the commentaries to the Model Penal Code "[t]o say that someone's conduct is 'justified' ordinarily connotes that the conduct is thought to be right, or at least not undesirable." . . ."to say that someone's conduct is 'excused' ordinarily connotes that the conduct is thought to be undesirable but that for some reason teh actor is not to be blamed for it.[1]

In some case, a given defense may act as both a justification or excuse.

Justification defenses include Necessity,Defense of others, Defense of property, Law Enforcement Defense, Consent.

Excuse defenses include Duress, Entrapment, Ignorance of the Law, Diminished Capacity Defense, Provocation, Insanity Defense, and Infancy Defense.


See Crimes, Defenses

Notes

  1. Model Penal Code Commentaries Article 3, introduction, at 3