Difference between revisions of "Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 406. Habit; Routine Practice"
From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with '==The Rule== Evidence of the habit of a person or of the routine practice of an organization, whether corroborated or not and regardless of the presence of eyewitnesses, is rele�') |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Evidence of the habit of a person or of the routine practice of an organization, whether corroborated or not and regardless of the presence of eyewitnesses, is relevant to prove that the conduct of the person or organization on a particular occasion was in conformity with the habit or routine practice. | Evidence of the habit of a person or of the routine practice of an organization, whether corroborated or not and regardless of the presence of eyewitnesses, is relevant to prove that the conduct of the person or organization on a particular occasion was in conformity with the habit or routine practice. | ||
| + | |||
| + | See [[Federal Rules of Evidence]] | ||
Revision as of 13:41, 25 June 2010
The Rule
Evidence of the habit of a person or of the routine practice of an organization, whether corroborated or not and regardless of the presence of eyewitnesses, is relevant to prove that the conduct of the person or organization on a particular occasion was in conformity with the habit or routine practice.
