Difference between revisions of "Cross-Examination"
From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 68: | Line 68: | ||
<blockquote>"The central theory that organizes all facts, reasons, arguments and furnishes the basic position from which one determines every action in the trial" - Mario Conte</blockquote> | <blockquote>"The central theory that organizes all facts, reasons, arguments and furnishes the basic position from which one determines every action in the trial" - Mario Conte</blockquote> | ||
<blockquote>"A paragraph of one to three sentences which summarizes the facts, emotions and legal basis for the citizen accused's acquittal or conviction on lesser charge while telling the defenses story of innocence or reduced culpability" - Vince Aprile</blockquote> | <blockquote>"A paragraph of one to three sentences which summarizes the facts, emotions and legal basis for the citizen accused's acquittal or conviction on lesser charge while telling the defenses story of innocence or reduced culpability" - Vince Aprile</blockquote> | ||
− | Cross-examination should be client-centered and driven by the law and the facts. The strategy for | + | Cross-examination should be client-centered and driven by the law and the facts. The strategy for cross-examination must fit within the larger strategy developed for the case. Thus, the goals of cross-examination are often to emphasize facts that support your theory and deemphasize or diminish facts that do not. A theory of the case is a common-sense articulation of the law and the facts that favors your client. |
== Closed-Ended Questions == | == Closed-Ended Questions == |