Difference between revisions of "Criminal Justice Systems Around the World"

From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 20: Line 20:
 
*[[China]]  
 
*[[China]]  
 
* Colombia
 
* Colombia
* [[Democratic Republic of Congo]]
+
 
* Ecuador
 
  
 
</div><div style="float: left; width: 25%">
 
</div><div style="float: left; width: 25%">
  
 +
* [[Democratic Republic of Congo]]
 +
* Ecuador
 
* Egypt
 
* Egypt
 
* El Salvador
 
* El Salvador
Line 38: Line 39:
 
*[[Indonesia]]
 
*[[Indonesia]]
 
*Iran
 
*Iran
 +
 +
 +
</div><div style="float: left; width: 25%">
 
* Iraq
 
* Iraq
 
* Italy
 
* Italy
 
</div><div style="float: left; width: 25%">
 
 
* Jordan
 
* Jordan
 
*[[Kenya]]
 
*[[Kenya]]
Line 56: Line 58:
 
* North Korea
 
* North Korea
 
* [[Pakistan]]
 
* [[Pakistan]]
* Paraguay
 
  
  
 
</div><div style="float: left; width: 25%">
 
</div><div style="float: left; width: 25%">
  
 +
* Paraguay
 
*[[Rwanda]]  
 
*[[Rwanda]]  
 
* Sierra Leone
 
* Sierra Leone

Revision as of 16:35, 13 January 2011

Criminal justice systems can be loosely classified as either common, civil, Islamic or socialist law in nature. However, today many jurisdictions have adopted hybrid models that combine elements of various legal systems. Many of these systems share a common set of core values. In addition, most criminal justice systems have adopted a legality principle. Almost every criminal justice system is made of of similar actors.

Country Pages