Difference between revisions of "Criminal Justice Systems Around the World"

From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 24: Line 24:
 
*[[China]]   
 
*[[China]]   
 
* Colombia
 
* Colombia
 +
 +
* Côte d'Ivoire
 
* Cyprus
 
* Cyprus
 
* [[Democratic Republic of Congo]]
 
* [[Democratic Republic of Congo]]
Line 52: Line 54:
 
* [[Italy]]
 
* [[Italy]]
 
*Jamaica
 
*Jamaica
 +
*Japan
 
* Jordan
 
* Jordan
 
*[[Kenya]]
 
*[[Kenya]]
Line 61: Line 64:
 
*[[Mexico]]
 
*[[Mexico]]
 
* Mongolia   
 
* Mongolia   
 +
* Morocco
 
*[[Myanmar]]
 
*[[Myanmar]]
 
* [[Nepal]]
 
* [[Nepal]]
Line 73: Line 77:
 
* [[Pakistan]]
 
* [[Pakistan]]
 
* Paraguay
 
* Paraguay
 +
* Peru
 +
* Poland
 +
* Romania
 
* [[Rwanda]]
 
* [[Rwanda]]
 
* Russia
 
* Russia
Line 79: Line 86:
 
* [[Singapore]]
 
* [[Singapore]]
 
* [[South Africa]]
 
* [[South Africa]]
 +
* Spain
 
*[[Sri Lanka]]
 
*[[Sri Lanka]]
 
* Sudan
 
* Sudan
Line 90: Line 98:
 
* Trinidad and Tobago  
 
* Trinidad and Tobago  
 
*[[The Republic of the Philippines]]
 
*[[The Republic of the Philippines]]
 +
* Turkey
 
*[[Uganda]]   
 
*[[Uganda]]   
 +
* Ukraine
 
*United Arab Emirates
 
*United Arab Emirates
 
*United Kingdom
 
*United Kingdom
 
*[[United States]]
 
*[[United States]]
 
* Uruguay   
 
* Uruguay   
 +
* Uzbekistan
 
* [[Venezuela]]
 
* [[Venezuela]]
 
*[[Vietnam]]   
 
*[[Vietnam]]   

Revision as of 19:39, 14 February 2011

Criminal justice systems can be loosely classified as either common, civil, Islamic or socialist law in nature. However, today many jurisdictions have adopted hybrid models that combine elements of various legal systems. Many of these systems share a common set of core values. In addition, most criminal justice systems have adopted a legality principle. Almost every criminal justice system is made of of similar actors.

Country Pages



Other Countries

See a country that is not listed here? Email elearning@ibj.org.