Error: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The types of errors that may occur at trial are the following: | The types of errors that may occur at trial are the following: | ||
Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
* Invited Error: This is where the defendant has asked the trial court to make a ruling which is actually erroneous. The defendant cannot then later appeal the trial court's decision on the basis of that error. | * Invited Error: This is where the defendant has asked the trial court to make a ruling which is actually erroneous. The defendant cannot then later appeal the trial court's decision on the basis of that error. | ||
* Reversible Error: An error which causes the appellate court to overturn the lower court's decision is a "reversible error." | * Reversible Error: An error which causes the appellate court to overturn the lower court's decision is a "reversible error." | ||
6 THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. YOU MAY STEP DOWN. PEOPLE | |||
7 MAY CALL THEIR NEXT WITNESS. | |||
8 MR. MURPHY: THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. AT THIS TIME | |||
9 THE PEOPLE CALL BECKY DAHER TO THE STAND. | |||
10 THE COURT: WHILE WE'RE WAITING FOR THE WITNESS. | |||
11 YESTERDAY AT THE END OF THE DAY I TOLD THE ATTORNEYS | |||
12 THAT I'M GOING TO START MAKING MY OWN OBJECTIONS, SO YOU | |||
13 MIGHT HAVE NOTICED THAT THIS MORNING. AND IT WILL | |||
14 CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE TRIAL, THAT I'M GOING TO START | |||
15 MAKING OBJECTIONS TO SOME OF THE QUESTIONS THAT HAVE | |||
16 BEEN ASKED. OKAY. | |||
17 BECKY DAHER, ^ | |||
18 CALLED AS A WITNESS BY THE PEOPLE, HAVING | |||
19 BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN, WAS EXAMINED AND TESTIFIED AS | |||
20 FOLLOWS: | |||
21 THE WITNESS: I DO. BECKY DAHER. D-A-H-E-R. | |||
22 THE COURT: YOU MAY PROCEED. | |||
23 DIRECT EXAMINATION ^ | |||
24 BY MR. MURPHY: | |||
25 Q THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. | |||
26 GOOD MORNING, MS. DAHER. | |||
? 690 | |||
1 A GOOD MORNING. | |||
2 Q WHAT DO YOU DO FOR A LIVING, MA'AM? | |||
3 A I'M A SENIOR FORENSIC SPECIALIST WITH THE | |||
4 ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S FORENSIC SCIENCE SERVICES | |||
5 IDENTIFICATION BUREAU. | |||
6 Q HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED IN THAT | |||
7 CAPACITY? | |||
8 A I STARTED WITH THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT IN | |||
9 1980, AND I PROGRESSED UP THROUGH THE DIFFERENT LEVELS | |||
10 OF FORENSIC SPECIALISTS. I LEFT IN '86 TO PURSUE SOME | |||
11 PERSONAL INTERESTS, AND I RETURNED IN 1995 TO PRESENT. | |||
12 Q OKAY. COULD YOU BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR | |||
13 EDUCATION BEFORE YOU BECAME A FORENSIC SPECIALIST? | |||
14 A I ATTENDED ABOUT THREE AND A HALF YEARS OF | |||
15 COLLEGE, AS WELL AS MY REGULAR EDUCATION AS A CHILD. | |||
16 AND I PURSUED SOME PHOTOGRAPHY INTERESTS, AS WELL AS | |||
17 ELEMENTARY EDUCATION INTERESTS. | |||
18 Q OKAY. AND REGARDING FORENSIC SCIENCE, CAN | |||
19 YOU TELL US ABOUT YOUR TRAINING IN THAT AREA? | |||
20 A I'VE HAD NUMEROUS COURSES THROUGH | |||
21 INSTITUTIONS, SUCH AS THE FBI ACADEMY, THE CALIFORNIA | |||
22 CRIMINALISTICS INSTITUTE, AND COURSES SPECIFICALLY | |||
23 RELATING TO THE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION, AND PACKAGING | |||
24 OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, NOTABLY FINGERPRINTS. CLASSES ON | |||
25 THE DEVELOPMENT OF FINGERPRINTS USING CHEMICAL METHODS | |||
26 AND INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES. | |||
? 691 | |||
1 ALSO COURSES ON THE COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS | |||
2 OF FINGERPRINTS, PALM IMPRESSIONS, AND THE QUANTITATIVE | |||
3 AND QUALITATIVE PORTIONS OR ASPECTS OF FRICTION RIDGE | |||
4 DETAIL, AND THE BIOLOGICAL GROWTH OF FRICTION RIDGE | |||
5 SKIN. | |||
6 Q CAN YOU BRIEFLY EXPLAIN WHAT THAT IS, | |||
7 FRICTION RIDGE DETAIL? | |||
8 A FRICTION RIDGE DETAIL IS A SPECIAL KIND OF | |||
9 SKIN THAT EVERYONE HAS ON THE PALMS OF THEIR HANDS, | |||
10 UNDER SIDES OF THE FINGERS, AND ON THE SOLES OF THE | |||
11 FEET, AND UNDER SIDES OF THE TOES. AND FRICTION RIDGE | |||
12 SKIN IS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED TO HELP US GRASP THINGS. | |||
13 AND EVERYONE HAS IT. | |||
14 Q ALL RIGHT. AND HOW DOES THAT AID YOU IN THE | |||
15 FIELD OF FORENSICS? | |||
16 A WELL IMPRESSIONS THAT ARE LEFT BEHIND AT | |||
17 CRIME SCENES, KNOWN AS LATENT PRINTS, MADE FROM FRICTION | |||
18 RIDGE SKIN ARE A TRANSFER OF SOME TYPE OF OIL OR | |||
19 DEPOSIT, MAYBE A CONTAMINATE FROM MOST LIKELY THE HANDS | |||
20 TO A SURFACE. AND BECAUSE FRICTION RIDGE SKIN IS UNIQUE | |||
21 AND PERMANENT, WE ARE ABLE TO LOOK AT THESE SMALL | |||
22 FRAGMENT PORTIONS OF DETAIL AND IDENTIFY INDIVIDUALS BY | |||
23 LOOKING AT LATENT PRINTS AND COMPARING THEIR FRICTION | |||
24 RIDGE SKIN TO KNOWN EXEMPLARS. | |||
25 Q WHEN YOU PERFORMED THAT PROCESS, WERE YOU | |||
26 COMPARING LATENTS TO NON-EXEMPLARS? TAKE US THROUGH | |||
? 692 | |||
1 THAT. HOW DOES THAT WORK? | |||
2 A WE USE A SCIENTIFIC PROCESS WHICH IS KNOWN BY | |||
3 AN ACRONYM CALLED ACE-V. IT'S, "ANALYZE, COMPARE, | |||
4 EVALUATE AND VERIFY." | |||
5 IN THE ANALYSIS PROCESS, WHICH IS THE FIRST | |||
6 PART OF THAT, WE LOOK AT THE UNKNOWN IMPRESSION OR THE | |||
7 LATENT PRINT FROM THE CRIME SCENE, AND WE ANALYZE IT FOR | |||
8 IN ITS ENTIRETY MAYBE THE RIDGE SHAPE, THE FLOW OF THE | |||
9 RIDGES, THE EDGE STRUCTURE CREASES, WRINKLES, DIFFERENT | |||
10 FEATURES THAT MIGHT START OR STOP, AND THEIR RELATIVE | |||
11 RELATIONSHIP TO ONE ANOTHER. SO WE LOOK AT THE PRINT IN | |||
12 ITS ENTIRETY, AND WE LOOK AT IT FOR ITS QUALITY AND ITS | |||
13 QUANTITY. | |||
14 AND WE ALSO THEN WILL LOOK IN THE NEXT | |||
15 PROCESS WE WILL COMPARE THAT PRINT TO ANY EXEMPLAR | |||
16 PRINTS THAT WE HAVE. | |||
17 THE THIRD STEP IN THAT PROCESS IS TO EVALUATE | |||
18 THE SIMILARITIES OR DISSIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE TWO, AND | |||
19 TO COME TO A CONCLUSION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THOSE TWO | |||
20 IMPRESSIONS WERE MADE BY THE SAME INDIVIDUAL. | |||
21 AFTER WE HAVE COME TO OUR CONCLUSION, WE THEN | |||
22 HAVE EVERY IMPRESSION VERIFIED BY A SECOND QUALIFIED | |||
23 EXAMINER WITH A HIGH LEVEL OF EXPERTISE AND TRAINING. | |||
24 AND THEN AT THAT POINT AND ONLY AT THAT POINT DO WE GIVE | |||
25 OUR CONCLUSION AND REPORT OUR FINDINGS. | |||
26 Q ALL RIGHT. IN JULY OF 1999, ACTUALLY I GUESS | |||
? 693 | |||
1 IT'S AUGUST OF 1999, WERE YOU ASKED TO PERFORM AN | |||
2 ANALYSIS OF FINGERPRINTS TAKEN FROM A CRIME SCENE IN | |||
3 IRVINE WITH THE ADDRESS OF 9 SOLANO? | |||
4 A YES. | |||
5 Q OKAY. WHAT I WOULD LIKE YOU TO DO, MA'AM, IS | |||
6 TELL US WHAT PRINTS OR HOW MANY -- I'M SORRY, STRIKE | |||
7 THAT. | |||
8 HOW MANY DIFFERENT LATENTS DID YOU EXAMINE IN | |||
9 RELATION TO THAT CASE? | |||
10 A MAY I PLEASE RETAIN MY NOTES FROM MY BRIEF | |||
11 CASE? | |||
12 Q IF THAT WOULD HELP REFRESH YOUR RECOLLECTION, | |||
13 WITH THE COURT'S PERMISSION. | |||
14 THE COURT: GO AHEAD. | |||
15 THE WITNESS: THANK YOU. THE LATENT PRINTS THAT I | |||
16 HAVE HERE IN FRONT OF ME ARE DATED 7/27 OF '99. AND | |||
17 THESE ARE MARKED FROM THE SCENE, AND THERE ARE A TOTAL | |||
18 OF SEVEN LATENT LIFT CARDS. | |||
19 BY MR. MURPHY: | |||
20 Q OKAY. IN ADDITION TO THE LATENT LIFTS FROM | |||
21 THE SCENE, WERE YOU ASKED TO PERFORM ANY COMPARISONS | |||
22 FROM LATENTS TAKEN FROM AN AUTOMOBILE THAT RELATED TO | |||
23 THAT CASE? | |||
24 A YES, I WAS. | |||
25 Q ALL RIGHT. AND HOW MANY LATENTS WERE YOU | |||
26 ASKED TO LOOK AT FROM THE AUTOMOBILE? | |||
? 694 | |||
1 A THERE WAS ONE LATENT FROM THE AUTOMOBILE. | |||
2 Q ALL RIGHT. AND TELL US, MA'AM, WHEN YOU GOT | |||
3 THE LATENT, WHERE DID YOU OBTAIN THE LATENT FROM? | |||
4 A I OBTAINED IT FROM OUR FILES AT THE SHERIFF'S | |||
5 DEPARTMENT. | |||
6 Q HOW WAS THAT LATENT INVOLVED? | |||
7 A I WOULD LIKE TO LOOK AT THE NOTES FROM THAT | |||
8 LATENT, IF YOU STILL HAVE THEM. | |||
9 Q OKAY. I DON'T HAVE THEM IN FRONT OF ME. DO | |||
10 YOU NOT HAVE THEM IN FRONT OF YOU? | |||
11 A NO, I DON'T. | |||
12 MR. MURPHY: OKAY. MAY I APPROACH, YOUR HONOR? | |||
13 THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. | |||
14 BY MR. MURPHY: | |||
15 Q MA'AM, SHOWING YOU WHAT HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY | |||
16 MARKED AS DEFENSE V FOR IDENTIFICATION. DO YOU | |||
17 RECOGNIZE THAT? | |||
18 A YES, I DO. | |||
19 Q OKAY. WHAT IS THAT? | |||
20 A THIS IS A COPY OF THE ENVELOPE CALLED A | |||
21 LATENT JACKET THAT WE STORE LATENT IMPRESSIONS IN IN OUR | |||
22 FILES AT THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT. | |||
23 Q OKAY. IS THAT A COPY OF THE LATENT JACKET | |||
24 THAT CONTAINED THE FINGERPRINT THAT WE'RE REFERRING TO? | |||
25 A YES, IT IS. | |||
26 Q OKAY. ONCE YOU OBTAINED THAT FINGERPRINT, | |||
? 695 | |||
1 TAKE US THROUGH IT. WHAT DID YOU DO? | |||
2 A I AGAIN WENT THROUGH THE ACV PROCESS, WHICH I | |||
3 INITIALLY ANALYZED THE PRINT FOR ITS VALUE, ITS QUALITY, | |||
4 CLARITY, AND DETAIL, THE SHAPE AND FLOW OF THE RIDGES. | |||
5 AND I WAS ABLE TO LOOK AT THAT PRINT IN COMPARISON TO | |||
6 THE INKED IMPRESSIONS THAT I HAD OF AN INDIVIDUAL, AND I | |||
7 WAS ABLE TO MAKE A DETERMINATION THAT THE LATENT ON THIS | |||
8 LATENT CARD WAS MADE BY THE SAME INDIVIDUAL AS THE | |||
9 PERSON I WAS COMPARING. | |||
10 Q OKAY. WHEN YOU WERE LOOKING AT THE KNOWN | |||
11 PRINT EXEMPLARS, WERE THE FINGERPRINTS TAKEN FROM THE | |||
12 INDIVIDUAL, WERE THOSE PRINTS MARKED IN SOMEWAY WITH A | |||
13 NAME? | |||
14 A YES. | |||
15 Q WHAT WAS THE NAME ON THOSE? | |||
16 A VINCENT CHEUNG. | |||
17 Q WAS THAT ALSO MARKED WITH THE ASSOCIATED CASE | |||
18 NUMBER? | |||
19 A YES, IT WAS. | |||
20 Q OKAY. AND THE CASE NUMBER, WAS THAT THE SAME | |||
21 AS THE ONE ON THE TRUNK? | |||
22 A YES. | |||
23 Q SAME ON THE LATENT LIFT ON THE TRUNK? | |||
24 A YES. | |||
25 Q I SHOULD SAY FROM THE TRUNK. I'M SORRY. | |||
26 WHEN YOU LOOKED AT THAT PRINT, WAS THAT -- WAS IT FROM A | |||
? 696 | |||
1 PALM? WAS IT FROM FINGERS? | |||
2 A IT WAS FINGER IMPRESSIONS. | |||
3 Q HOW MANY DIFFERENT FINGERS? | |||
4 A LET ME REFER TO ANOTHER SET OF NOTES THAT I | |||
5 HAVE, IF I COULD PLEASE. | |||
6 MR. MURPHY: WITH THE COURT'S PERMISSION? | |||
7 THE COURT: GO AHEAD. | |||
8 THE WITNESS: ACCORDING TO MY NOTES THERE WERE | |||
9 FOUR AREAS OF LATENT DETAIL THAT WERE IDENTIFIED TO | |||
10 FINGERS. | |||
11 BY MR. MURPHY: | |||
12 Q OKAY. AND DOES THAT MEAN FOUR FINGERS OR | |||
13 JUST ONE PRINT WITH FOUR AREAS? | |||
14 A THERE WAS A SINGLE LATENT LIFT CARD, AND WE | |||
15 SUBDIVIDED THE LATENT CARD INTO SUBDIVIDED AREAS OF | |||
16 INDIVIDUAL DETAIL. AND IN THIS CASE THERE WERE FOUR | |||
17 AREAS OF INDIVIDUAL DETAIL THAT WERE IDENTIFIED, THREE | |||
18 OF THOSE AREAS TO THE LEFT MIDDLE FINGER, AND ONE AREA | |||
19 TO THE LEFT RING FINGER. | |||
20 Q OKAY. NOW MOVING ONTO THE PRINTS TAKEN FROM | |||
21 INSIDE THE HOUSE. HOW MANY DID YOU SAY THERE WERE? | |||
22 A THERE ARE SEVEN LATENT LIFT CARDS FROM THE | |||
23 CRIME SCENE. | |||
24 Q OKAY. AND AS YOU EXAMINED THOSE, HOW MANY OF | |||
25 THOSE WERE OF EVIDENTIARY VALUE? | |||
26 THE COURT: WELL, THAT'S VAGUE. I MEAN, SHE | |||
? 697 | |||
1 DOESN'T KNOW WHAT THE CASE IS TO DETERMINE IF IT'S OF | |||
2 EVIDENTIARY VALUE. | |||
3 DID YOU MAKE ANY MATCHES? | |||
4 BY MR. MURPHY: | |||
5 Q THANK YOU. DID YOU LOOK AT ALL SEVEN? | |||
6 A YES, I DID. | |||
7 Q OKAY. AND OF THOSE SEVEN, DID THEY ALL HAVE | |||
8 ENOUGH DETAIL WITH WHICH YOU COULD PERFORM A FORENSIC | |||
9 FINGERPRINT ANALYSIS? | |||
10 A NO, THEY DID NOT. | |||
11 Q HOW MANY OF THEM HAD ENOUGH DETAIL FOR YOU TO | |||
12 DO THAT? | |||
13 A FIVE. | |||
14 Q AND AS YOU EXAMINED THOSE SEPARATE LATENTS, | |||
15 WERE THEY ALSO MARKED IN A SIMILAR MANNER AS THE ONE | |||
16 FROM THE TRUNK? | |||
17 A YES. | |||
18 Q OKAY. AND DID THOSE MARKINGS INCLUDE THE | |||
19 AREA FROM THE HOME THAT THEY WERE LIFTED FROM? | |||
20 A YES. | |||
21 Q WHAT I WOULD LIKE YOU TO DO, MA'AM, IS | |||
22 REGARDING THE FIRST ONE YOU LOOKED AT. PLEASE TELL US | |||
23 HOW THAT WAS MARKED, AND WHETHER OR NOT THERE WAS ENOUGH | |||
24 THERE FOR YOU TO MAKE A FORENSIC ANALYSIS? | |||
25 A OKAY. LATENT LIFT NUMBER ONE WAS LABELED | |||
26 MASTER BEDROOM DOOR RIGHT EXTERIOR, IN PARENTHESIS, AND | |||
? 698 | |||
1 IT WAS OF NO VALUE FOR COMPARISON. | |||
2 Q OKAY. WHAT ABOUT LATENT LIFT NUMBER TWO? | |||
3 A LATENT LIFT NUMBER TWO WAS MARKED MASTER | |||
4 BEDROOM DOORJAMB, IN PARENTHESIS, RIGHT EXTERIOR. AND | |||
5 IT WAS IDENTIFIED TO THE VICTIM WHITNEY'S RIGHT PALM. | |||
6 Q OKAY. LET ME JUST STOP YOU THERE. AS YOU | |||
7 PERFORMED THESE EXAMINATIONS OF THESE LATENTS, WHAT WERE | |||
8 YOU COMPARING THEM AGAINST? | |||
9 A I WAS COMPARING THEM AGAINST THE CORONER'S | |||
10 EXEMPLARS THAT WERE TAKEN DURING AUTOPSY. | |||
11 Q AND AUTOPSIES OF WHOM? | |||
12 A OF THE VICTIMS, WHITNEY AND WONG. | |||
13 Q BUT THOMAS WHITNEY, LARRY WONG, WERE YOU ALSO | |||
14 COMPARING THEM AGAINST THE SAME EXEMPLAR PROVIDED BY THE | |||
15 DEFENDANT? | |||
16 A YES, I WAS. | |||
17 Q OKAY. SO AS YOU'RE GOING THROUGH THESE, | |||
18 YOU'RE LOOKING AT THREE SEPARATE PRINTS, MR. WHITNEY, | |||
19 MR. WONG, AND MR. CHEUNG? | |||
20 A THAT'S CORRECT. | |||
21 Q OKAY. SO YOU SAID THAT NUMBER TWO, YOU WERE | |||
22 ABLE TO MATCH THAT TO MR. WHITNEY; IS THAT RIGHT? | |||
23 A THAT'S CORRECT. | |||
24 Q OKAY. NOW TELL US ABOUT LATENT LIFT NUMBER | |||
25 THREE? | |||
26 A LIFT NUMBER THREE WAS LABELED KITCHEN DOOR | |||
? 699 | |||
1 EDGE, AND WAS IDENTIFIED AS WHITNEY'S RIGHT INDEX | |||
2 FINGER. | |||
3 Q WHAT ABOUT LATENT LIFT NUMBER FOUR? | |||
4 A LATENT LIFT NUMBER FOUR WAS LABELED FACE OF | |||
5 STOVE WITH KNOBS, AND WAS OF NO VALUE FOR COMPARISON. | |||
6 Q WHAT ABOUT LATENT LIFT NUMBER FIVE? | |||
7 A LIFT FIVE WAS LABELED KITCHEN SINK, IN | |||
8 PARENTHESIS LEFT SIDE. IT WAS NOT MADE TO WHITNEY NOR | |||
9 CHEUNG, AND IT WAS INCONCLUSIVE TO VICTIM WONG. | |||
10 Q ALL RIGHT. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN, | |||
11 INCONCLUSIVE? | |||
12 A MANY TIMES WE HAVE DETAIL THAT MIGHT BE | |||
13 RETRIEVED FROM A SURFACE THAT IS ON AN EXTREME PORTION | |||
14 OF THE FINGER, SIDES OF THE PALMS, TIPS OF THE FINGERS. | |||
15 ESPECIALLY IN CORONER'S PRINTS THAT ARE RETRIEVED FROM | |||
16 AN AUTOPSY, IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO RECORD ALL OF THE | |||
17 FRICTION RIDGE SURFACE FROM THE HANDS AND FINGERS. | |||
18 IN THIS CASE THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH DETAIL | |||
19 PRESENT IN THE FRICTION RIDGE EXEMPLAR OF WONG TAKEN AT | |||
20 AUTOPSY TO CONCLUSIVELY COMPARE THE IMPRESSION LIFT | |||
21 NUMBER FIVE FROM THE KITCHEN SINK, SO WE WERE NOT ABLE | |||
22 TO DRAW A CONCLUSIVE RESULT FROM THAT. | |||
23 Q OKAY. AND WHAT ABOUT THE FLIP SIDE OF THAT. | |||
24 WERE YOU ABLE TO ELIMINATE MR. WONG AS A POTENTIAL | |||
25 CONTRIBUTOR OF THAT PRINT? | |||
26 A NO. | |||
? 700 | |||
1 Q PLEASE TELL US ABOUT LATENT LIFT NUMBER SIX? | |||
2 A LIFT SIX WAS FROM THE KITCHEN COUNTER, RIGHT | |||
3 SIDE OF THE SINK, AND WAS IDENTIFIED AS THE RIGHT PALM | |||
4 OF VICTIM WHITNEY. | |||
5 Q ALL RIGHT. AND FINALLY, LIFT NUMBER SEVEN? | |||
6 A LIFT NUMBER SEVEN WAS FROM THE TOP, IN | |||
7 PARENTHESIS, LID OF WASHER, AND WAS NOT MADE TO WHITNEY | |||
8 NOR CHEUNG, AND AGAIN WAS INCONCLUSIVE TO WONG. | |||
9 Q NOW YOU DID NOT PHYSICALLY GO TO THE CRIME | |||
10 SCENE AT 9 SOLANO; IS THAT CORRECT? | |||
11 A THAT'S CORRECT. | |||
12 Q HAVE YOU REVIEWED THE REPORTS WRITTEN BY | |||
13 OTHER PEOPLE WHO WERE THERE IN MAKING YOUR COMPARISONS? | |||
14 A NO. | |||
15 MR. MURPHY: THANK YOU. AT THIS POINT, I HAVE | |||
16 NOTHING FURTHER. | |||
17 THE COURT: CROSS. | |||
18 CROSS-EXAMINATION ^ | |||
19 BY MS. PETROSINO: | |||
20 Q YES. MS. DAHER, YOU PREPARED A REPORT IN | |||
21 THIS CASE; IS THAT CORRECT? | |||
22 A THAT'S CORRECT. | |||
23 Q AND PRIOR TO PREPARING THAT REPORT OR DOING | |||
24 ANY ANALYSIS, YOU WERE GIVEN A REQUEST BY SOMEONE, | |||
25 CORRECT? | |||
26 A YES. | |||
? 701 | |||
1 Q OKAY. AND IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE -- AND YOU | |||
2 PUT THAT REQUEST ON YOUR REPORT, CORRECT? | |||
3 A I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU MEAN? | |||
4 Q OKAY. AS PART OF YOUR REPORT -- WELL, DO YOU | |||
5 HAVE YOUR REPORT IN FRONT OF YOU? | |||
6 A LET ME LOOK, PLEASE. OKAY. YES, I DO. | |||
7 Q OKAY. AND IN YOUR REPORT ARE THERE THINGS -- | |||
8 ARE THERE THINGS THAT YOU PUT ON AND THEN THINGS THAT | |||
9 SOMEBODY ELSE MAY HAVE PUT ON, OR IS IT ALL YOURS, THE | |||
10 INFORMATION? | |||
11 A THE COPY OF THE REPORT THAT I'M LOOKING AT IS | |||
12 MARKED WITH DIFFERENT NOTATIONS FROM OUR CLERICAL STAFF | |||
13 FOR FILING PURPOSES AND COPY PURPOSES. | |||
14 Q YOU HAVE LIST ITEM TO BE EXAMINED, AND YOU | |||
15 HAVE COMPARE LATENTS FROM VEHICLE DEVELOPED BY KMB. DO | |||
16 YOU KNOW WHO KMB IS? | |||
17 A YES, I DO. | |||
18 Q WHO IS THAT? | |||
19 A THAT'S KELLI BROWN. | |||
20 Q AND YOU ALSO HAVE IN YOUR REPORT, COMPARE | |||
21 LATENTS FROM THE SCENE DEVELOPED BY DEM. DO YOU KNOW | |||
22 WHO THAT IS? | |||
23 A THAT'S DELORA MOGA. | |||
24 Q AND YOU ALSO HAVE ON THE SAME REPORT VINCENT | |||
25 CHEUNG'S NAME, CORRECT? | |||
26 A YES. | |||
? 702 | |||
1 Q ALL RIGHT. AND YOU ALSO HAVE INFORMATION | |||
2 THAT IT'S A HOMICIDE, CORRECT? | |||
3 A YES. | |||
4 Q NOW IN YOUR EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING, YOU TAKE | |||
5 LATENT -- YOU'RE TAKING ELIMINATION PRINTS. YOU COMPARE | |||
6 -- HAVE YOU HEARD THE TERM, ELIMINATION PRINTS? | |||
7 A YES. | |||
8 Q WHAT IS THAT? | |||
9 A ELIMINATION PRINTS ARE GENERALLY FINGERPRINTS | |||
10 THAT ARE FROM A VICTIM, EXEMPLARS FROM A VICTIM, OR A | |||
11 SOURCE THAT IS USED TO ELIMINATE BECAUSE THEY MIGHT HAVE | |||
12 HAD SPECIFIC CONTACT OR REASONABLE CONTACT WITH THE | |||
13 SURFACE WHERE THE PRINTS WERE LIFTED. | |||
14 Q BY REASONABLE YOU MEAN -- WELL WHAT DO YOU | |||
15 MEAN BY REASONABLE? | |||
16 A LIKE, FOR EXAMPLE, IF WE GO TO A BURGLARY | |||
17 SCENE AT A HOME AND A PRINT IS LIFTED FROM THE FRONT | |||
18 DOOR, THE OWNER OF THE HOME WOULD HAVE HIS ELIMINATION | |||
19 PRINTS TAKEN BECAUSE WE KNOW HE BELONGS THERE. WE KNOW | |||
20 THAT HE GOES IN AND OUT OF THAT DOOR ALL THE TIME, SO IT | |||
21 WOULD BE REASONABLE TO THINK THAT THAT PRINT MIGHT | |||
22 BELONG TO HIM. AND SO THE ELIMINATION PRINTS OF THE | |||
23 VICTIM ARE TAKEN IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE THAT PRINT AS A | |||
24 POSSIBLE SUSPECT PRINT. | |||
25 Q SO WHEN YOU MAKE A DETERMINATION THAT | |||
26 SOMEBODY LEFT THEIR PRINTS THERE, YOU'RE NOT DETERMINING | |||
? 703 | |||
1 UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCE THEY WERE LEFT, YOU'RE SIMPLY | |||
2 DETERMINING THAT THERE MAY OR MAY NOT BE A FINGERPRINT | |||
3 THERE BELONGING TO THAT PERSON. LET ME REPHRASE THAT. | |||
4 YOUR ASSESSMENT THAT SOMEBODY HAS LEFT A | |||
5 FINGERPRINT AND YOU HAVE IDENTIFIED IT TO THAT PERSON IS | |||
6 SIMPLY THAT, CORRECT? | |||
7 A YES. | |||
8 Q IN OTHER WORDS -- | |||
9 THE COURT: THAT'S A LITTLE VAGUE. IT IS WHAT? | |||
10 BY MS. PETROSINO: | |||
11 Q YOU'RE NOT DETERMINING UNDER WHAT | |||
12 CIRCUMSTANCE THEY LEFT IT THERE, CORRECT? | |||
13 A CORRECT. | |||
14 Q ALL RIGHT. AND CAN YOU DETERMINE WHEN THEY | |||
15 LEFT IT THERE? | |||
16 A NO, MA'AM. | |||
17 Q SO -- OKAY. NOW YOU TALKED ABOUT RIDGE | |||
18 DETAIL, AND YOU TOLD US THAT THOSE ARE THE DETAILS THAT | |||
19 YOU'RE ACTUALLY LOOKING AT AND MAKING COMPARISONS, | |||
20 CORRECT? | |||
21 A CORRECT. | |||
22 Q IN YOUR ASSESSMENT, THERE ARE TIMES WHEN YOU | |||
23 CAN MAKE -- WHEN YOU CAN'T MAKE A COMPARISON BECAUSE | |||
24 THERE'S NOT ENOUGH RIDGE DETAIL IN THE FINGERPRINT, | |||
25 CORRECT? THE LATENT? THE UNKNOWN? | |||
26 A THAT'S CORRECT. | |||
? 704 | |||
1 Q LATENT MEANS UNKNOWN TO YOU, CORRECT? | |||
2 A YES. | |||
3 Q ALL RIGHT. THEN WE HAVE THE KNOWNS, CORRECT? | |||
4 A YES. | |||
5 Q ALL RIGHT. ARE THERE ALSO TIMES WHEN YOU | |||
6 CAN'T MAKE A DETERMINATION BECAUSE THE KNOWNS WEREN'T | |||
7 TAKEN PROPERLY? | |||
8 A YES. | |||
9 Q AND THAT'S WHAT YOU WERE TALKING A LITTLE BIT | |||
10 ABOUT BEFORE WITH SOMETIMES ON AUTOPSY FINGERPRINTS | |||
11 THEY'RE NOT CLEAR ENOUGH FOR ONE REASON OR ANOTHER, YOU | |||
12 CAN'T MAKE A DETERMINATION ON ALL THE FINGERS? | |||
13 A THAT'S CORRECT. | |||
14 Q ALL RIGHT. DO YOU HAVE YOUR FINGERPRINT | |||
15 CARDS WITH YOU FROM THE CRIME SCENE? | |||
16 A YES. | |||
17 Q MAY I SEE THEM? | |||
18 MS. PETROSINO: YOUR HONOR, WOULD IT BE ACCEPTABLE | |||
19 TO MARK ALL SEVEN OF THE CARDS AS DEFENSE NEXT IN ORDER, | |||
20 OR DO YOU WANT THEM INDIVIDUALLY MARKED? | |||
21 THE COURT: I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IDENTIFYING | |||
22 INFORMATION IS ON EACH CARD SO YOU COULD TELL THEM | |||
23 APART. | |||
24 IN ANY CASE, WE'RE GOING TO TAKE OUR MORNING | |||
25 RECESS. WE'RE GOING TO RESUME AT 20 MINUTES OF 11:00. | |||
26 I'LL REMIND YOU NOT TO DISCUSS THE CASE OR FORM ANY | |||
? 705 | |||
1 OPINIONS ABOUT IT UNTIL IT IS SUBMITTED TO YOU. PLEASE | |||
2 GATHER BACK OUTSIDE THE DOORS OF THIS COURTROOM AT 20 | |||
3 MINUTES OF 11:00. | |||
4 (MORNING RECESS.) | |||
5 (THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE HAD IN OPEN | |||
6 COURT IN THE PRESENCE OF THE JURY:) | |||
7 THE COURT: BACK ON THE RECORD ON PEOPLE VERSUS | |||
8 CHEUNG. ALL OF OUR JURORS ARE PRESENT. AND BOTH | |||
9 COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT ARE PRESENT. WITNESS IS BACK ON | |||
10 THE STAND. | |||
11 SO DEFENSE MAY PROCEED WITH | |||
12 CROSS-EXAMINATION. | |||
13 MS. PETROSINO: THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. | |||
14 BY MS. PETROSINO: | |||
15 Q WHAT I'VE MARKED AS DEFENSE -- OR WHAT I | |||
16 WOULD ASK TO BE MARKED AS DEFENSE Y FOR IDENTIFICATION. | |||
17 YOU SEE WHAT I'M REFERRING TO? | |||
18 A YES. | |||
19 (DEFENSE Y = MARKED) | |||
20 Q THAT'S A PHOTOCOPY OF THE JACKET THAT SHOWS | |||
21 WHO TOOK THE PRINTS OUT? | |||
22 A YES. | |||
23 Q OR WHO LOOKED AT THEM? | |||
24 A YES. | |||
25 Q THANK YOU. | |||
26 NOW X1 THROUGH 7 ARE THE ACTUAL CARDS WITH | |||
? 706 | |||
1 THE SKETCH OF WHERE THE FINGERPRINT WAS TAKEN ON ONE | |||
2 SIGNED AND THE FINGERPRINT ITSELF ON THE OTHER, CORRECT? | |||
3 A CORRECT. | |||
4 Q AND YOU DIDN'T EITHER -- DID YOU DRAW THE | |||
5 SKETCH? | |||
6 A NO. | |||
7 Q ALL RIGHT. AND YOU DIDN'T TAKE THE PRINTS, | |||
8 CORRECT? | |||
9 A CORRECT. | |||
10 Q YOU DID THE COMPARISON? | |||
11 A YES. | |||
12 Q ALL RIGHT. AND JUST SO WE KNOW. THE NUMBERS | |||
13 1 THROUGH 7 THAT YOU TALKED ABOUT FROM THE CRIME SCENE, | |||
14 THAT'S THESE CARDS, CORRECT? | |||
15 A YES. | |||
16 Q AND THE NUMBER LIFT ONE CORRESPONDS WITH WHAT | |||
17 YOU SAID IS ONE ON YOUR DIRECT TESTIMONY, CORRECT? | |||
18 A YES. | |||
19 Q ALL RIGHT. AND LIKEWISE THROUGH 7? | |||
20 A CORRECT. | |||
21 Q FOR ALL THE LATENTS THAT YOU COMPARED, | |||
22 DEFENSE X1 THROUGH 7, MR. CHEUNG'S PRINTS WERE NOT FOUND | |||
23 THERE, CORRECT? | |||
24 A CORRECT. | |||
25 Q AND YOU DOCUMENTED THAT IN YOUR REPORT, | |||
26 CORRECT? | |||
? 707 | |||
1 A YES. | |||
2 Q ALL RIGHT. IN TERMS OF CATEGORIZING THEM. | |||
3 SOME OF THOSE 1 THROUGH 7 YOU COULD IDENTIFY AS | |||
4 MR. WHITNEY'S, CORRECT? | |||
5 A YES. | |||
6 Q ALL RIGHT. AND YOU'VE TOLD US WHAT THOSE | |||
7 WERE? | |||
8 A CORRECT. | |||
9 Q ON NUMBER 4 YOU SAID, AND IF YOU WANT TO LOOK | |||
10 AT THE LATENT CARD I'D BE HAPPY TO SHOW IT TO YOU TO | |||
11 HELP YOU REFRESH YOUR MEMORY. I THINK YOU SAID IT HAD | |||
12 NO VALUE, CORRECT? | |||
13 A YES. | |||
14 Q WHAT DO YOU MEAN WHEN YOU SAY NO VALUE? | |||
15 A WHEN A LATENT IMPRESSION IS OF NO VALUE FOR | |||
16 COMPARISON, THAT MEANS THAT THE CLARITY IN DETAIL IS NOT | |||
17 PRESENT AND WE HAVE NOTHING THAT WE CAN LOOK AT AND MAKE | |||
18 A DETERMINATION OF WHO MIGHT HAVE LEFT THAT IMPRESSION. | |||
19 Q NOW IF I LOOK AT THIS CARD, THERE ARE SEVERAL | |||
20 MARKINGS ON THE CARD ON THE BACK WHERE THE FINGERPRINT | |||
21 IS; WOULD YOU AGREE WITH ME ON THAT? | |||
22 A YES. | |||
23 Q ALL RIGHT. WERE YOU LOOKING AT THE ENTIRE | |||
24 CARD OR ONE PARTICULAR MARKING? | |||
25 A THE ENTIRE CARD. | |||
26 Q ALL RIGHT. ON NUMBER 5. AND IF YOU NEED TO | |||
? 708 | |||
1 LOOK AT THE CARD I'D BE HAPPY TO SHOW YOU. THAT'S THE | |||
2 SINK AREA. | |||
3 A YES. | |||
4 Q ON THAT ONE YOU SAID IT'S NOT MR. WHITNEY, | |||
5 IT'S NOT MR. CHEUNG, AND IT'S INCONCLUSIVE AS TO | |||
6 MR. WONG. AND WAS THAT ONE OF THE ONES BECAUSE YOU | |||
7 COULDN'T TELL FROM MR. WONG'S FINGERPRINT? | |||
8 A YES, THE EXEMPLARS WERE OF INSUFFICIENT | |||
9 QUALITY TO DRAW A CONCLUSION. | |||
10 Q ON THE CARD THAT YOU HAVE THERE, 5, ARE YOU | |||
11 LOOKING AT A PARTICULAR FINGER ON THE HAND OR A PALM OR | |||
12 WHAT EXACTLY CAN YOU TELL WHAT IT IS? | |||
13 A I WOULD HAVE TO HAVE A MAGNIFIER. I WOULD | |||
14 HAVE TO BE ABLE TO LOOK AT IT IN THE SAME CONDITIONS | |||
15 THAT I LOOK AT IT WHEN I DO A COMPARISON. | |||
16 Q OKAY. I GUESS I WANT TO ASK YOU. WERE ALL | |||
17 OF MR. WONG'S ELIMINATION PRINTS THAT YOU HAD, WERE THEY | |||
18 ALL OF INSUFFICIENT QUALITY THAT YOU COULDN'T USE THEM | |||
19 AT ALL, OR IS IT JUST CERTAIN FINGERS? | |||
20 A I DON'T KNOW THAT. | |||
21 Q WOULD YOUR NOTES -- BECAUSE YOU SAID -- | |||
22 BECAUSE IN NUMBER 5 YOU SAID THAT IT'S INCONCLUSIVE AS | |||
23 TO MR. WONG. WOULD YOUR NOTES REFLECT WHAT PART OF IT | |||
24 IS INCONCLUSIVE, WHETHER IT'S HIS ENTIRE EXEMPLAR OR | |||
25 JUST PART OF IT? | |||
26 A IT DOES NOT REFLECT THAT. | |||
? 709 | |||
1 Q AND CARD NUMBER 7, X7. SHOW YOU THAT AGAIN. | |||
2 LET ME BACK UP TO 5. FIVE HAD ENOUGH RIDGE DETAIL THAT | |||
3 YOU WERE ABLE TO MAKE A DETERMINATION THE CARD ITSELF, | |||
4 THE LATENT, THE UNKNOWN HAD ENOUGH RIDGE DETAIL, | |||
5 CORRECT? | |||
6 A YES. | |||
7 Q IN YOUR OPINION. | |||
8 NUMBER 7. THAT WAS ALSO ONE YOU SAID | |||
9 EXCLUDED MR. WHITNEY, EXCLUDED MR. CHEUNG, BUT WAS | |||
10 INCONCLUSIVE AS TO MR. WONG, CORRECT? | |||
11 A CORRECT. | |||
12 Q SAME QUESTION FOR THAT ONE AS NUMBER 5. DO | |||
13 YOU KNOW WHY IT WAS INCONCLUSIVE? WAS IT HIS ENTIRE | |||
14 EXEMPLAR, HIS ENTIRE PRINT THAT THEY TOOK, OR WAS IT | |||
15 JUST A PART OF THAT? | |||
16 A I DON'T KNOW. | |||
17 Q BUT IN NUMBER 7 THERE WAS ENOUGH RIDGE DETAIL | |||
18 TO MAKE A DETERMINATION OF SOME SORT ON THE UNKNOWN | |||
19 PRINT? | |||
20 A YES. | |||
21 Q MR. WHITNEY'S EXEMPLAR -- WHEN I SAY | |||
22 EXEMPLAR. COULD YOU TELL ME WHAT YOU BELIEVE I MEAN BY | |||
23 THAT? | |||
24 THE COURT: WELL, THAT'S IRRELEVANT. SHE DOESN'T | |||
25 HAVE TO TRY TO FIGURE OUT WHAT YOU MEAN. | |||
26 MS. PETROSINO: SURE. | |||
? 710 | |||
1 BY MS. PETROSINO: | |||
2 Q I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE ON THE SAME | |||
3 PAGE WHEN I WAS SAYING EXEMPLAR, SO WHAT DO YOU MEAN | |||
4 WHEN YOU SAY EXEMPLAR? | |||
5 A I MEAN A FINGERPRINT CARD THAT WAS | |||
6 DELIBERATELY TAKEN AND WHO WE KNOW THE DONOR IS. | |||
7 Q OKAY. AND USING THAT DEFINITION, WAS THERE | |||
8 ANYTHING ABOUT THE EXEMPLAR OF MR. WHITNEY THAT WAS | |||
9 INCONCLUSIVE ITSELF? | |||
10 A THERE'S NO INDICATION ON ANY OF MY CASE NOTES | |||
11 THAT INDICATES THAT THERE WERE INCONCLUSIVE RESULTS TO | |||
12 MR. WHITNEY. | |||
13 Q AND THAT WAS PROBABLY -- WELL ACTUALLY THAT | |||
14 ANSWERS THE QUESTION. | |||
15 WERE MR. WHITNEY'S PRINTS, THE EXEMPLARS THAT | |||
16 WERE TAKEN, WERE THEY OF SUFFICIENT QUALITY THAT YOU | |||
17 COULD USE THEM TO MAKE ASSESSMENTS? | |||
18 A YES. | |||
19 Q OKAY. THE CARD THAT YOU LOOKED AT FROM THE | |||
20 LATENTS, THE UNKNOWNS FROM THE VEHICLE, YOU DON'T GET | |||
21 THE INFORMATION AS TO WHOSE VEHICLE THAT IS, DO YOU? | |||
22 A THAT IS CORRECT. | |||
23 Q YOU'RE JUST LOOKING AT THE PRINTS, CORRECT? | |||
24 A YES. | |||
25 MS. PETROSINO: THANK YOU. I HAVE NOTHING FURTHER. | |||
26 THE COURT: REDIRECT. | |||
? 711 | |||
1 REDIRECT EXAMINATION ^ | |||
2 BY MR. MURPHY: | |||
3 Q THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. | |||
4 MS. DAHER, REGARDING LATENT LIFT NUMBER 2, | |||
5 CAN YOU REFRESH MY MEMORY ON THAT. | |||
6 THE COURT: WELL, HOLD ON. THAT'S IRRELEVANT. | |||
7 SHE DOESN'T HAVE TO REFRESH YOUR MEMORY. | |||
8 BY MR. MURPHY: | |||
9 Q OKAY. IF I COULD HAVE JUST ONE MOMENT, YOUR | |||
10 HONOR. | |||
11 THE COURT: OKAY. | |||
12 BY MR. MURPHY: | |||
13 Q THE MASTER BEDROOM DOORJAMB, LATENT LIFT | |||
14 NUMBER 2, WHAT WAS THE RESULT OF THE COMPARISON OF THAT | |||
15 PRINT? | |||
16 A LATENT LIFT NUMBER 2 WAS IDENTIFIED AS THE | |||
17 LEFT PALM OF MR. WHITNEY. | |||
18 Q OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO WERE ANY OF THE PRINTS | |||
19 MADE TO MR. WONG? | |||
20 A NO. | |||
21 Q WHY IS THAT? YOU TESTIFIED THERE ARE | |||
22 SOMETIMES PROBLEMS WHEN EXEMPLARS ARE TAKEN FROM PEOPLE | |||
23 IN THE MORGUE. WHY IS THAT? | |||
24 MS. PETROSINO: OBJECTION. ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN | |||
25 -- LACKS FOUNDATION. | |||
26 THE COURT: WELL IT'S IRRELEVANT AS TO EVERYONE | |||
? 712 | |||
1 ELSE. IF YOU WANT TO ASK HER WHAT THE PROBLEMS WERE | |||
2 WITH MR. WONG'S PRINTS, THAT'S FINE. | |||
3 BY MR. MURPHY: | |||
4 Q OKAY. WHAT WERE THE PROBLEMS WITH MR. WONG'S | |||
5 PRINTS? | |||
6 A THEY MAY HAVE LACKED CLARITY IN CERTAIN | |||
7 AREAS. THERE MAY HAVE BEEN SMUDGING AS A RESULT OF THE | |||
8 RIGIDITY OF THE FINGERS, AND THE DIFFICULTY IN TAKING | |||
9 INKED EXEMPLARS FROM A DECEASED PERSON. | |||
10 Q OKAY. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE DIFFICULTY | |||
11 IN TAKING INKED EXEMPLARS FROM A DECEASED PERSON? | |||
12 A YES, I AM. | |||
13 Q WHAT ARE THOSE DIFFICULTIES? | |||
14 A THEY ARE -- HANDS ARE VERY RIGID, AND IT'S | |||
15 VERY DIFFICULT TO OFTEN TIMES GET THE FINGERS TO BECOME | |||
16 FLEXIBLE ENOUGH TO RETAIN A GOOD INKED IMPRESSION | |||
17 BECAUSE THEY'RE OFTEN TIMES VERY CLAW LIKE, AND EVEN | |||
18 THEIR HANDS SOMETIMES ARE CLOSED. AND SO IN ORDER TO | |||
19 GET INSIDE, WE HAVE TO PULL THEIR FINGERS APART AND | |||
20 BREAK THE RIGOR IN THE FINGERS AND TRY AND INK THE | |||
21 PRINTS AND THEN DEPOSIT THOSE PRINTS CLEARLY ON A PAPER | |||
22 SURFACE OF SOME KIND. | |||
23 Q WHAT IS RIGOR? | |||
24 A RIGOR OCCURS WHEN THE JOINTS ARE BEING FIXED | |||
25 AFTER DEATH. | |||
26 MR. MURPHY: THANK YOU. I HAVE NOTHING FURTHER. | |||
? 713 | |||
1 THE COURT: RECROSS. | |||
2 MS. PETROSINO: NO. THANK YOU. | |||
3 THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. YOU MAY STEP DOWN. |
Revision as of 17:43, 23 June 2010
The types of errors that may occur at trial are the following:
- Fundamental Error: This is an error which goes to the heart of the case, and which can be considered by the court "in the interest of justice," even if the appellant fails to properly raise the issue on appeal.
- Harmful Error: This is an error which the appellate court concludes had a probable impact on the outcome of the trial.
- Harmless Error: This is an error which the appellate court concludes had no effect on the outcome of a trial. For example, if a defendant confesses to a murder, and the prosecution has his fingerprints on the murder weapon, the use of inadmissible hearsay testimony is likely to be found harmless due to the overwhelming evidence against the defendant.
- Invited Error: This is where the defendant has asked the trial court to make a ruling which is actually erroneous. The defendant cannot then later appeal the trial court's decision on the basis of that error.
- Reversible Error: An error which causes the appellate court to overturn the lower court's decision is a "reversible error."
6 THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. YOU MAY STEP DOWN. PEOPLE
7 MAY CALL THEIR NEXT WITNESS.
8 MR. MURPHY: THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. AT THIS TIME
9 THE PEOPLE CALL BECKY DAHER TO THE STAND.
10 THE COURT: WHILE WE'RE WAITING FOR THE WITNESS.
11 YESTERDAY AT THE END OF THE DAY I TOLD THE ATTORNEYS
12 THAT I'M GOING TO START MAKING MY OWN OBJECTIONS, SO YOU
13 MIGHT HAVE NOTICED THAT THIS MORNING. AND IT WILL
14 CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE TRIAL, THAT I'M GOING TO START
15 MAKING OBJECTIONS TO SOME OF THE QUESTIONS THAT HAVE
16 BEEN ASKED. OKAY.
17 BECKY DAHER, ^
18 CALLED AS A WITNESS BY THE PEOPLE, HAVING
19 BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN, WAS EXAMINED AND TESTIFIED AS
20 FOLLOWS:
21 THE WITNESS: I DO. BECKY DAHER. D-A-H-E-R.
22 THE COURT: YOU MAY PROCEED.
23 DIRECT EXAMINATION ^
24 BY MR. MURPHY:
25 Q THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
26 GOOD MORNING, MS. DAHER.
? 690
1 A GOOD MORNING.
2 Q WHAT DO YOU DO FOR A LIVING, MA'AM?
3 A I'M A SENIOR FORENSIC SPECIALIST WITH THE
4 ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S FORENSIC SCIENCE SERVICES
5 IDENTIFICATION BUREAU.
6 Q HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED IN THAT
7 CAPACITY?
8 A I STARTED WITH THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT IN
9 1980, AND I PROGRESSED UP THROUGH THE DIFFERENT LEVELS
10 OF FORENSIC SPECIALISTS. I LEFT IN '86 TO PURSUE SOME
11 PERSONAL INTERESTS, AND I RETURNED IN 1995 TO PRESENT.
12 Q OKAY. COULD YOU BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR
13 EDUCATION BEFORE YOU BECAME A FORENSIC SPECIALIST?
14 A I ATTENDED ABOUT THREE AND A HALF YEARS OF
15 COLLEGE, AS WELL AS MY REGULAR EDUCATION AS A CHILD.
16 AND I PURSUED SOME PHOTOGRAPHY INTERESTS, AS WELL AS
17 ELEMENTARY EDUCATION INTERESTS.
18 Q OKAY. AND REGARDING FORENSIC SCIENCE, CAN
19 YOU TELL US ABOUT YOUR TRAINING IN THAT AREA?
20 A I'VE HAD NUMEROUS COURSES THROUGH
21 INSTITUTIONS, SUCH AS THE FBI ACADEMY, THE CALIFORNIA
22 CRIMINALISTICS INSTITUTE, AND COURSES SPECIFICALLY
23 RELATING TO THE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION, AND PACKAGING
24 OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, NOTABLY FINGERPRINTS. CLASSES ON
25 THE DEVELOPMENT OF FINGERPRINTS USING CHEMICAL METHODS
26 AND INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES.
? 691
1 ALSO COURSES ON THE COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS
2 OF FINGERPRINTS, PALM IMPRESSIONS, AND THE QUANTITATIVE
3 AND QUALITATIVE PORTIONS OR ASPECTS OF FRICTION RIDGE
4 DETAIL, AND THE BIOLOGICAL GROWTH OF FRICTION RIDGE
5 SKIN.
6 Q CAN YOU BRIEFLY EXPLAIN WHAT THAT IS,
7 FRICTION RIDGE DETAIL?
8 A FRICTION RIDGE DETAIL IS A SPECIAL KIND OF
9 SKIN THAT EVERYONE HAS ON THE PALMS OF THEIR HANDS,
10 UNDER SIDES OF THE FINGERS, AND ON THE SOLES OF THE
11 FEET, AND UNDER SIDES OF THE TOES. AND FRICTION RIDGE
12 SKIN IS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED TO HELP US GRASP THINGS.
13 AND EVERYONE HAS IT.
14 Q ALL RIGHT. AND HOW DOES THAT AID YOU IN THE
15 FIELD OF FORENSICS?
16 A WELL IMPRESSIONS THAT ARE LEFT BEHIND AT
17 CRIME SCENES, KNOWN AS LATENT PRINTS, MADE FROM FRICTION
18 RIDGE SKIN ARE A TRANSFER OF SOME TYPE OF OIL OR
19 DEPOSIT, MAYBE A CONTAMINATE FROM MOST LIKELY THE HANDS
20 TO A SURFACE. AND BECAUSE FRICTION RIDGE SKIN IS UNIQUE
21 AND PERMANENT, WE ARE ABLE TO LOOK AT THESE SMALL
22 FRAGMENT PORTIONS OF DETAIL AND IDENTIFY INDIVIDUALS BY
23 LOOKING AT LATENT PRINTS AND COMPARING THEIR FRICTION
24 RIDGE SKIN TO KNOWN EXEMPLARS.
25 Q WHEN YOU PERFORMED THAT PROCESS, WERE YOU
26 COMPARING LATENTS TO NON-EXEMPLARS? TAKE US THROUGH
? 692
1 THAT. HOW DOES THAT WORK?
2 A WE USE A SCIENTIFIC PROCESS WHICH IS KNOWN BY
3 AN ACRONYM CALLED ACE-V. IT'S, "ANALYZE, COMPARE,
4 EVALUATE AND VERIFY."
5 IN THE ANALYSIS PROCESS, WHICH IS THE FIRST
6 PART OF THAT, WE LOOK AT THE UNKNOWN IMPRESSION OR THE
7 LATENT PRINT FROM THE CRIME SCENE, AND WE ANALYZE IT FOR
8 IN ITS ENTIRETY MAYBE THE RIDGE SHAPE, THE FLOW OF THE
9 RIDGES, THE EDGE STRUCTURE CREASES, WRINKLES, DIFFERENT
10 FEATURES THAT MIGHT START OR STOP, AND THEIR RELATIVE
11 RELATIONSHIP TO ONE ANOTHER. SO WE LOOK AT THE PRINT IN
12 ITS ENTIRETY, AND WE LOOK AT IT FOR ITS QUALITY AND ITS
13 QUANTITY.
14 AND WE ALSO THEN WILL LOOK IN THE NEXT
15 PROCESS WE WILL COMPARE THAT PRINT TO ANY EXEMPLAR
16 PRINTS THAT WE HAVE.
17 THE THIRD STEP IN THAT PROCESS IS TO EVALUATE
18 THE SIMILARITIES OR DISSIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE TWO, AND
19 TO COME TO A CONCLUSION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THOSE TWO
20 IMPRESSIONS WERE MADE BY THE SAME INDIVIDUAL.
21 AFTER WE HAVE COME TO OUR CONCLUSION, WE THEN
22 HAVE EVERY IMPRESSION VERIFIED BY A SECOND QUALIFIED
23 EXAMINER WITH A HIGH LEVEL OF EXPERTISE AND TRAINING.
24 AND THEN AT THAT POINT AND ONLY AT THAT POINT DO WE GIVE
25 OUR CONCLUSION AND REPORT OUR FINDINGS.
26 Q ALL RIGHT. IN JULY OF 1999, ACTUALLY I GUESS
? 693
1 IT'S AUGUST OF 1999, WERE YOU ASKED TO PERFORM AN
2 ANALYSIS OF FINGERPRINTS TAKEN FROM A CRIME SCENE IN
3 IRVINE WITH THE ADDRESS OF 9 SOLANO?
4 A YES.
5 Q OKAY. WHAT I WOULD LIKE YOU TO DO, MA'AM, IS
6 TELL US WHAT PRINTS OR HOW MANY -- I'M SORRY, STRIKE
7 THAT.
8 HOW MANY DIFFERENT LATENTS DID YOU EXAMINE IN
9 RELATION TO THAT CASE?
10 A MAY I PLEASE RETAIN MY NOTES FROM MY BRIEF
11 CASE?
12 Q IF THAT WOULD HELP REFRESH YOUR RECOLLECTION,
13 WITH THE COURT'S PERMISSION.
14 THE COURT: GO AHEAD.
15 THE WITNESS: THANK YOU. THE LATENT PRINTS THAT I
16 HAVE HERE IN FRONT OF ME ARE DATED 7/27 OF '99. AND
17 THESE ARE MARKED FROM THE SCENE, AND THERE ARE A TOTAL
18 OF SEVEN LATENT LIFT CARDS.
19 BY MR. MURPHY:
20 Q OKAY. IN ADDITION TO THE LATENT LIFTS FROM
21 THE SCENE, WERE YOU ASKED TO PERFORM ANY COMPARISONS
22 FROM LATENTS TAKEN FROM AN AUTOMOBILE THAT RELATED TO
23 THAT CASE?
24 A YES, I WAS.
25 Q ALL RIGHT. AND HOW MANY LATENTS WERE YOU
26 ASKED TO LOOK AT FROM THE AUTOMOBILE?
? 694
1 A THERE WAS ONE LATENT FROM THE AUTOMOBILE.
2 Q ALL RIGHT. AND TELL US, MA'AM, WHEN YOU GOT
3 THE LATENT, WHERE DID YOU OBTAIN THE LATENT FROM?
4 A I OBTAINED IT FROM OUR FILES AT THE SHERIFF'S
5 DEPARTMENT.
6 Q HOW WAS THAT LATENT INVOLVED?
7 A I WOULD LIKE TO LOOK AT THE NOTES FROM THAT
8 LATENT, IF YOU STILL HAVE THEM.
9 Q OKAY. I DON'T HAVE THEM IN FRONT OF ME. DO
10 YOU NOT HAVE THEM IN FRONT OF YOU?
11 A NO, I DON'T.
12 MR. MURPHY: OKAY. MAY I APPROACH, YOUR HONOR?
13 THE COURT: ALL RIGHT.
14 BY MR. MURPHY:
15 Q MA'AM, SHOWING YOU WHAT HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY
16 MARKED AS DEFENSE V FOR IDENTIFICATION. DO YOU
17 RECOGNIZE THAT?
18 A YES, I DO.
19 Q OKAY. WHAT IS THAT?
20 A THIS IS A COPY OF THE ENVELOPE CALLED A
21 LATENT JACKET THAT WE STORE LATENT IMPRESSIONS IN IN OUR
22 FILES AT THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT.
23 Q OKAY. IS THAT A COPY OF THE LATENT JACKET
24 THAT CONTAINED THE FINGERPRINT THAT WE'RE REFERRING TO?
25 A YES, IT IS.
26 Q OKAY. ONCE YOU OBTAINED THAT FINGERPRINT,
? 695
1 TAKE US THROUGH IT. WHAT DID YOU DO?
2 A I AGAIN WENT THROUGH THE ACV PROCESS, WHICH I
3 INITIALLY ANALYZED THE PRINT FOR ITS VALUE, ITS QUALITY,
4 CLARITY, AND DETAIL, THE SHAPE AND FLOW OF THE RIDGES.
5 AND I WAS ABLE TO LOOK AT THAT PRINT IN COMPARISON TO
6 THE INKED IMPRESSIONS THAT I HAD OF AN INDIVIDUAL, AND I
7 WAS ABLE TO MAKE A DETERMINATION THAT THE LATENT ON THIS
8 LATENT CARD WAS MADE BY THE SAME INDIVIDUAL AS THE
9 PERSON I WAS COMPARING.
10 Q OKAY. WHEN YOU WERE LOOKING AT THE KNOWN
11 PRINT EXEMPLARS, WERE THE FINGERPRINTS TAKEN FROM THE
12 INDIVIDUAL, WERE THOSE PRINTS MARKED IN SOMEWAY WITH A
13 NAME?
14 A YES.
15 Q WHAT WAS THE NAME ON THOSE?
16 A VINCENT CHEUNG.
17 Q WAS THAT ALSO MARKED WITH THE ASSOCIATED CASE
18 NUMBER?
19 A YES, IT WAS.
20 Q OKAY. AND THE CASE NUMBER, WAS THAT THE SAME
21 AS THE ONE ON THE TRUNK?
22 A YES.
23 Q SAME ON THE LATENT LIFT ON THE TRUNK?
24 A YES.
25 Q I SHOULD SAY FROM THE TRUNK. I'M SORRY.
26 WHEN YOU LOOKED AT THAT PRINT, WAS THAT -- WAS IT FROM A
? 696
1 PALM? WAS IT FROM FINGERS?
2 A IT WAS FINGER IMPRESSIONS.
3 Q HOW MANY DIFFERENT FINGERS?
4 A LET ME REFER TO ANOTHER SET OF NOTES THAT I
5 HAVE, IF I COULD PLEASE.
6 MR. MURPHY: WITH THE COURT'S PERMISSION?
7 THE COURT: GO AHEAD.
8 THE WITNESS: ACCORDING TO MY NOTES THERE WERE
9 FOUR AREAS OF LATENT DETAIL THAT WERE IDENTIFIED TO
10 FINGERS.
11 BY MR. MURPHY:
12 Q OKAY. AND DOES THAT MEAN FOUR FINGERS OR
13 JUST ONE PRINT WITH FOUR AREAS?
14 A THERE WAS A SINGLE LATENT LIFT CARD, AND WE
15 SUBDIVIDED THE LATENT CARD INTO SUBDIVIDED AREAS OF
16 INDIVIDUAL DETAIL. AND IN THIS CASE THERE WERE FOUR
17 AREAS OF INDIVIDUAL DETAIL THAT WERE IDENTIFIED, THREE
18 OF THOSE AREAS TO THE LEFT MIDDLE FINGER, AND ONE AREA
19 TO THE LEFT RING FINGER.
20 Q OKAY. NOW MOVING ONTO THE PRINTS TAKEN FROM
21 INSIDE THE HOUSE. HOW MANY DID YOU SAY THERE WERE?
22 A THERE ARE SEVEN LATENT LIFT CARDS FROM THE
23 CRIME SCENE.
24 Q OKAY. AND AS YOU EXAMINED THOSE, HOW MANY OF
25 THOSE WERE OF EVIDENTIARY VALUE?
26 THE COURT: WELL, THAT'S VAGUE. I MEAN, SHE
? 697
1 DOESN'T KNOW WHAT THE CASE IS TO DETERMINE IF IT'S OF
2 EVIDENTIARY VALUE.
3 DID YOU MAKE ANY MATCHES?
4 BY MR. MURPHY:
5 Q THANK YOU. DID YOU LOOK AT ALL SEVEN?
6 A YES, I DID.
7 Q OKAY. AND OF THOSE SEVEN, DID THEY ALL HAVE
8 ENOUGH DETAIL WITH WHICH YOU COULD PERFORM A FORENSIC
9 FINGERPRINT ANALYSIS?
10 A NO, THEY DID NOT.
11 Q HOW MANY OF THEM HAD ENOUGH DETAIL FOR YOU TO
12 DO THAT?
13 A FIVE.
14 Q AND AS YOU EXAMINED THOSE SEPARATE LATENTS,
15 WERE THEY ALSO MARKED IN A SIMILAR MANNER AS THE ONE
16 FROM THE TRUNK?
17 A YES.
18 Q OKAY. AND DID THOSE MARKINGS INCLUDE THE
19 AREA FROM THE HOME THAT THEY WERE LIFTED FROM?
20 A YES.
21 Q WHAT I WOULD LIKE YOU TO DO, MA'AM, IS
22 REGARDING THE FIRST ONE YOU LOOKED AT. PLEASE TELL US
23 HOW THAT WAS MARKED, AND WHETHER OR NOT THERE WAS ENOUGH
24 THERE FOR YOU TO MAKE A FORENSIC ANALYSIS?
25 A OKAY. LATENT LIFT NUMBER ONE WAS LABELED
26 MASTER BEDROOM DOOR RIGHT EXTERIOR, IN PARENTHESIS, AND
? 698
1 IT WAS OF NO VALUE FOR COMPARISON.
2 Q OKAY. WHAT ABOUT LATENT LIFT NUMBER TWO?
3 A LATENT LIFT NUMBER TWO WAS MARKED MASTER
4 BEDROOM DOORJAMB, IN PARENTHESIS, RIGHT EXTERIOR. AND
5 IT WAS IDENTIFIED TO THE VICTIM WHITNEY'S RIGHT PALM.
6 Q OKAY. LET ME JUST STOP YOU THERE. AS YOU
7 PERFORMED THESE EXAMINATIONS OF THESE LATENTS, WHAT WERE
8 YOU COMPARING THEM AGAINST?
9 A I WAS COMPARING THEM AGAINST THE CORONER'S
10 EXEMPLARS THAT WERE TAKEN DURING AUTOPSY.
11 Q AND AUTOPSIES OF WHOM?
12 A OF THE VICTIMS, WHITNEY AND WONG.
13 Q BUT THOMAS WHITNEY, LARRY WONG, WERE YOU ALSO
14 COMPARING THEM AGAINST THE SAME EXEMPLAR PROVIDED BY THE
15 DEFENDANT?
16 A YES, I WAS.
17 Q OKAY. SO AS YOU'RE GOING THROUGH THESE,
18 YOU'RE LOOKING AT THREE SEPARATE PRINTS, MR. WHITNEY,
19 MR. WONG, AND MR. CHEUNG?
20 A THAT'S CORRECT.
21 Q OKAY. SO YOU SAID THAT NUMBER TWO, YOU WERE
22 ABLE TO MATCH THAT TO MR. WHITNEY; IS THAT RIGHT?
23 A THAT'S CORRECT.
24 Q OKAY. NOW TELL US ABOUT LATENT LIFT NUMBER
25 THREE?
26 A LIFT NUMBER THREE WAS LABELED KITCHEN DOOR
? 699
1 EDGE, AND WAS IDENTIFIED AS WHITNEY'S RIGHT INDEX
2 FINGER.
3 Q WHAT ABOUT LATENT LIFT NUMBER FOUR?
4 A LATENT LIFT NUMBER FOUR WAS LABELED FACE OF
5 STOVE WITH KNOBS, AND WAS OF NO VALUE FOR COMPARISON.
6 Q WHAT ABOUT LATENT LIFT NUMBER FIVE?
7 A LIFT FIVE WAS LABELED KITCHEN SINK, IN
8 PARENTHESIS LEFT SIDE. IT WAS NOT MADE TO WHITNEY NOR
9 CHEUNG, AND IT WAS INCONCLUSIVE TO VICTIM WONG.
10 Q ALL RIGHT. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN,
11 INCONCLUSIVE?
12 A MANY TIMES WE HAVE DETAIL THAT MIGHT BE
13 RETRIEVED FROM A SURFACE THAT IS ON AN EXTREME PORTION
14 OF THE FINGER, SIDES OF THE PALMS, TIPS OF THE FINGERS.
15 ESPECIALLY IN CORONER'S PRINTS THAT ARE RETRIEVED FROM
16 AN AUTOPSY, IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO RECORD ALL OF THE
17 FRICTION RIDGE SURFACE FROM THE HANDS AND FINGERS.
18 IN THIS CASE THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH DETAIL
19 PRESENT IN THE FRICTION RIDGE EXEMPLAR OF WONG TAKEN AT
20 AUTOPSY TO CONCLUSIVELY COMPARE THE IMPRESSION LIFT
21 NUMBER FIVE FROM THE KITCHEN SINK, SO WE WERE NOT ABLE
22 TO DRAW A CONCLUSIVE RESULT FROM THAT.
23 Q OKAY. AND WHAT ABOUT THE FLIP SIDE OF THAT.
24 WERE YOU ABLE TO ELIMINATE MR. WONG AS A POTENTIAL
25 CONTRIBUTOR OF THAT PRINT?
26 A NO.
? 700
1 Q PLEASE TELL US ABOUT LATENT LIFT NUMBER SIX?
2 A LIFT SIX WAS FROM THE KITCHEN COUNTER, RIGHT
3 SIDE OF THE SINK, AND WAS IDENTIFIED AS THE RIGHT PALM
4 OF VICTIM WHITNEY.
5 Q ALL RIGHT. AND FINALLY, LIFT NUMBER SEVEN?
6 A LIFT NUMBER SEVEN WAS FROM THE TOP, IN
7 PARENTHESIS, LID OF WASHER, AND WAS NOT MADE TO WHITNEY
8 NOR CHEUNG, AND AGAIN WAS INCONCLUSIVE TO WONG.
9 Q NOW YOU DID NOT PHYSICALLY GO TO THE CRIME
10 SCENE AT 9 SOLANO; IS THAT CORRECT?
11 A THAT'S CORRECT.
12 Q HAVE YOU REVIEWED THE REPORTS WRITTEN BY
13 OTHER PEOPLE WHO WERE THERE IN MAKING YOUR COMPARISONS?
14 A NO.
15 MR. MURPHY: THANK YOU. AT THIS POINT, I HAVE
16 NOTHING FURTHER.
17 THE COURT: CROSS.
18 CROSS-EXAMINATION ^
19 BY MS. PETROSINO:
20 Q YES. MS. DAHER, YOU PREPARED A REPORT IN
21 THIS CASE; IS THAT CORRECT?
22 A THAT'S CORRECT.
23 Q AND PRIOR TO PREPARING THAT REPORT OR DOING
24 ANY ANALYSIS, YOU WERE GIVEN A REQUEST BY SOMEONE,
25 CORRECT?
26 A YES.
? 701
1 Q OKAY. AND IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE -- AND YOU
2 PUT THAT REQUEST ON YOUR REPORT, CORRECT?
3 A I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU MEAN?
4 Q OKAY. AS PART OF YOUR REPORT -- WELL, DO YOU
5 HAVE YOUR REPORT IN FRONT OF YOU?
6 A LET ME LOOK, PLEASE. OKAY. YES, I DO.
7 Q OKAY. AND IN YOUR REPORT ARE THERE THINGS --
8 ARE THERE THINGS THAT YOU PUT ON AND THEN THINGS THAT
9 SOMEBODY ELSE MAY HAVE PUT ON, OR IS IT ALL YOURS, THE
10 INFORMATION?
11 A THE COPY OF THE REPORT THAT I'M LOOKING AT IS
12 MARKED WITH DIFFERENT NOTATIONS FROM OUR CLERICAL STAFF
13 FOR FILING PURPOSES AND COPY PURPOSES.
14 Q YOU HAVE LIST ITEM TO BE EXAMINED, AND YOU
15 HAVE COMPARE LATENTS FROM VEHICLE DEVELOPED BY KMB. DO
16 YOU KNOW WHO KMB IS?
17 A YES, I DO.
18 Q WHO IS THAT?
19 A THAT'S KELLI BROWN.
20 Q AND YOU ALSO HAVE IN YOUR REPORT, COMPARE
21 LATENTS FROM THE SCENE DEVELOPED BY DEM. DO YOU KNOW
22 WHO THAT IS?
23 A THAT'S DELORA MOGA.
24 Q AND YOU ALSO HAVE ON THE SAME REPORT VINCENT
25 CHEUNG'S NAME, CORRECT?
26 A YES.
? 702
1 Q ALL RIGHT. AND YOU ALSO HAVE INFORMATION
2 THAT IT'S A HOMICIDE, CORRECT?
3 A YES.
4 Q NOW IN YOUR EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING, YOU TAKE
5 LATENT -- YOU'RE TAKING ELIMINATION PRINTS. YOU COMPARE
6 -- HAVE YOU HEARD THE TERM, ELIMINATION PRINTS?
7 A YES.
8 Q WHAT IS THAT?
9 A ELIMINATION PRINTS ARE GENERALLY FINGERPRINTS
10 THAT ARE FROM A VICTIM, EXEMPLARS FROM A VICTIM, OR A
11 SOURCE THAT IS USED TO ELIMINATE BECAUSE THEY MIGHT HAVE
12 HAD SPECIFIC CONTACT OR REASONABLE CONTACT WITH THE
13 SURFACE WHERE THE PRINTS WERE LIFTED.
14 Q BY REASONABLE YOU MEAN -- WELL WHAT DO YOU
15 MEAN BY REASONABLE?
16 A LIKE, FOR EXAMPLE, IF WE GO TO A BURGLARY
17 SCENE AT A HOME AND A PRINT IS LIFTED FROM THE FRONT
18 DOOR, THE OWNER OF THE HOME WOULD HAVE HIS ELIMINATION
19 PRINTS TAKEN BECAUSE WE KNOW HE BELONGS THERE. WE KNOW
20 THAT HE GOES IN AND OUT OF THAT DOOR ALL THE TIME, SO IT
21 WOULD BE REASONABLE TO THINK THAT THAT PRINT MIGHT
22 BELONG TO HIM. AND SO THE ELIMINATION PRINTS OF THE
23 VICTIM ARE TAKEN IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE THAT PRINT AS A
24 POSSIBLE SUSPECT PRINT.
25 Q SO WHEN YOU MAKE A DETERMINATION THAT
26 SOMEBODY LEFT THEIR PRINTS THERE, YOU'RE NOT DETERMINING
? 703
1 UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCE THEY WERE LEFT, YOU'RE SIMPLY
2 DETERMINING THAT THERE MAY OR MAY NOT BE A FINGERPRINT
3 THERE BELONGING TO THAT PERSON. LET ME REPHRASE THAT.
4 YOUR ASSESSMENT THAT SOMEBODY HAS LEFT A
5 FINGERPRINT AND YOU HAVE IDENTIFIED IT TO THAT PERSON IS
6 SIMPLY THAT, CORRECT?
7 A YES.
8 Q IN OTHER WORDS --
9 THE COURT: THAT'S A LITTLE VAGUE. IT IS WHAT?
10 BY MS. PETROSINO:
11 Q YOU'RE NOT DETERMINING UNDER WHAT
12 CIRCUMSTANCE THEY LEFT IT THERE, CORRECT?
13 A CORRECT.
14 Q ALL RIGHT. AND CAN YOU DETERMINE WHEN THEY
15 LEFT IT THERE?
16 A NO, MA'AM.
17 Q SO -- OKAY. NOW YOU TALKED ABOUT RIDGE
18 DETAIL, AND YOU TOLD US THAT THOSE ARE THE DETAILS THAT
19 YOU'RE ACTUALLY LOOKING AT AND MAKING COMPARISONS,
20 CORRECT?
21 A CORRECT.
22 Q IN YOUR ASSESSMENT, THERE ARE TIMES WHEN YOU
23 CAN MAKE -- WHEN YOU CAN'T MAKE A COMPARISON BECAUSE
24 THERE'S NOT ENOUGH RIDGE DETAIL IN THE FINGERPRINT,
25 CORRECT? THE LATENT? THE UNKNOWN?
26 A THAT'S CORRECT.
? 704
1 Q LATENT MEANS UNKNOWN TO YOU, CORRECT?
2 A YES.
3 Q ALL RIGHT. THEN WE HAVE THE KNOWNS, CORRECT?
4 A YES.
5 Q ALL RIGHT. ARE THERE ALSO TIMES WHEN YOU
6 CAN'T MAKE A DETERMINATION BECAUSE THE KNOWNS WEREN'T
7 TAKEN PROPERLY?
8 A YES.
9 Q AND THAT'S WHAT YOU WERE TALKING A LITTLE BIT
10 ABOUT BEFORE WITH SOMETIMES ON AUTOPSY FINGERPRINTS
11 THEY'RE NOT CLEAR ENOUGH FOR ONE REASON OR ANOTHER, YOU
12 CAN'T MAKE A DETERMINATION ON ALL THE FINGERS?
13 A THAT'S CORRECT.
14 Q ALL RIGHT. DO YOU HAVE YOUR FINGERPRINT
15 CARDS WITH YOU FROM THE CRIME SCENE?
16 A YES.
17 Q MAY I SEE THEM?
18 MS. PETROSINO: YOUR HONOR, WOULD IT BE ACCEPTABLE
19 TO MARK ALL SEVEN OF THE CARDS AS DEFENSE NEXT IN ORDER,
20 OR DO YOU WANT THEM INDIVIDUALLY MARKED?
21 THE COURT: I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IDENTIFYING
22 INFORMATION IS ON EACH CARD SO YOU COULD TELL THEM
23 APART.
24 IN ANY CASE, WE'RE GOING TO TAKE OUR MORNING
25 RECESS. WE'RE GOING TO RESUME AT 20 MINUTES OF 11:00.
26 I'LL REMIND YOU NOT TO DISCUSS THE CASE OR FORM ANY
? 705
1 OPINIONS ABOUT IT UNTIL IT IS SUBMITTED TO YOU. PLEASE
2 GATHER BACK OUTSIDE THE DOORS OF THIS COURTROOM AT 20
3 MINUTES OF 11:00.
4 (MORNING RECESS.)
5 (THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE HAD IN OPEN
6 COURT IN THE PRESENCE OF THE JURY:)
7 THE COURT: BACK ON THE RECORD ON PEOPLE VERSUS
8 CHEUNG. ALL OF OUR JURORS ARE PRESENT. AND BOTH
9 COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT ARE PRESENT. WITNESS IS BACK ON
10 THE STAND.
11 SO DEFENSE MAY PROCEED WITH
12 CROSS-EXAMINATION.
13 MS. PETROSINO: THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
14 BY MS. PETROSINO:
15 Q WHAT I'VE MARKED AS DEFENSE -- OR WHAT I
16 WOULD ASK TO BE MARKED AS DEFENSE Y FOR IDENTIFICATION.
17 YOU SEE WHAT I'M REFERRING TO?
18 A YES.
19 (DEFENSE Y = MARKED)
20 Q THAT'S A PHOTOCOPY OF THE JACKET THAT SHOWS
21 WHO TOOK THE PRINTS OUT?
22 A YES.
23 Q OR WHO LOOKED AT THEM?
24 A YES.
25 Q THANK YOU.
26 NOW X1 THROUGH 7 ARE THE ACTUAL CARDS WITH
? 706
1 THE SKETCH OF WHERE THE FINGERPRINT WAS TAKEN ON ONE
2 SIGNED AND THE FINGERPRINT ITSELF ON THE OTHER, CORRECT?
3 A CORRECT.
4 Q AND YOU DIDN'T EITHER -- DID YOU DRAW THE
5 SKETCH?
6 A NO.
7 Q ALL RIGHT. AND YOU DIDN'T TAKE THE PRINTS,
8 CORRECT?
9 A CORRECT.
10 Q YOU DID THE COMPARISON?
11 A YES.
12 Q ALL RIGHT. AND JUST SO WE KNOW. THE NUMBERS
13 1 THROUGH 7 THAT YOU TALKED ABOUT FROM THE CRIME SCENE,
14 THAT'S THESE CARDS, CORRECT?
15 A YES.
16 Q AND THE NUMBER LIFT ONE CORRESPONDS WITH WHAT
17 YOU SAID IS ONE ON YOUR DIRECT TESTIMONY, CORRECT?
18 A YES.
19 Q ALL RIGHT. AND LIKEWISE THROUGH 7?
20 A CORRECT.
21 Q FOR ALL THE LATENTS THAT YOU COMPARED,
22 DEFENSE X1 THROUGH 7, MR. CHEUNG'S PRINTS WERE NOT FOUND
23 THERE, CORRECT?
24 A CORRECT.
25 Q AND YOU DOCUMENTED THAT IN YOUR REPORT,
26 CORRECT?
? 707
1 A YES.
2 Q ALL RIGHT. IN TERMS OF CATEGORIZING THEM.
3 SOME OF THOSE 1 THROUGH 7 YOU COULD IDENTIFY AS
4 MR. WHITNEY'S, CORRECT?
5 A YES.
6 Q ALL RIGHT. AND YOU'VE TOLD US WHAT THOSE
7 WERE?
8 A CORRECT.
9 Q ON NUMBER 4 YOU SAID, AND IF YOU WANT TO LOOK
10 AT THE LATENT CARD I'D BE HAPPY TO SHOW IT TO YOU TO
11 HELP YOU REFRESH YOUR MEMORY. I THINK YOU SAID IT HAD
12 NO VALUE, CORRECT?
13 A YES.
14 Q WHAT DO YOU MEAN WHEN YOU SAY NO VALUE?
15 A WHEN A LATENT IMPRESSION IS OF NO VALUE FOR
16 COMPARISON, THAT MEANS THAT THE CLARITY IN DETAIL IS NOT
17 PRESENT AND WE HAVE NOTHING THAT WE CAN LOOK AT AND MAKE
18 A DETERMINATION OF WHO MIGHT HAVE LEFT THAT IMPRESSION.
19 Q NOW IF I LOOK AT THIS CARD, THERE ARE SEVERAL
20 MARKINGS ON THE CARD ON THE BACK WHERE THE FINGERPRINT
21 IS; WOULD YOU AGREE WITH ME ON THAT?
22 A YES.
23 Q ALL RIGHT. WERE YOU LOOKING AT THE ENTIRE
24 CARD OR ONE PARTICULAR MARKING?
25 A THE ENTIRE CARD.
26 Q ALL RIGHT. ON NUMBER 5. AND IF YOU NEED TO
? 708
1 LOOK AT THE CARD I'D BE HAPPY TO SHOW YOU. THAT'S THE
2 SINK AREA.
3 A YES.
4 Q ON THAT ONE YOU SAID IT'S NOT MR. WHITNEY,
5 IT'S NOT MR. CHEUNG, AND IT'S INCONCLUSIVE AS TO
6 MR. WONG. AND WAS THAT ONE OF THE ONES BECAUSE YOU
7 COULDN'T TELL FROM MR. WONG'S FINGERPRINT?
8 A YES, THE EXEMPLARS WERE OF INSUFFICIENT
9 QUALITY TO DRAW A CONCLUSION.
10 Q ON THE CARD THAT YOU HAVE THERE, 5, ARE YOU
11 LOOKING AT A PARTICULAR FINGER ON THE HAND OR A PALM OR
12 WHAT EXACTLY CAN YOU TELL WHAT IT IS?
13 A I WOULD HAVE TO HAVE A MAGNIFIER. I WOULD
14 HAVE TO BE ABLE TO LOOK AT IT IN THE SAME CONDITIONS
15 THAT I LOOK AT IT WHEN I DO A COMPARISON.
16 Q OKAY. I GUESS I WANT TO ASK YOU. WERE ALL
17 OF MR. WONG'S ELIMINATION PRINTS THAT YOU HAD, WERE THEY
18 ALL OF INSUFFICIENT QUALITY THAT YOU COULDN'T USE THEM
19 AT ALL, OR IS IT JUST CERTAIN FINGERS?
20 A I DON'T KNOW THAT.
21 Q WOULD YOUR NOTES -- BECAUSE YOU SAID --
22 BECAUSE IN NUMBER 5 YOU SAID THAT IT'S INCONCLUSIVE AS
23 TO MR. WONG. WOULD YOUR NOTES REFLECT WHAT PART OF IT
24 IS INCONCLUSIVE, WHETHER IT'S HIS ENTIRE EXEMPLAR OR
25 JUST PART OF IT?
26 A IT DOES NOT REFLECT THAT.
? 709
1 Q AND CARD NUMBER 7, X7. SHOW YOU THAT AGAIN.
2 LET ME BACK UP TO 5. FIVE HAD ENOUGH RIDGE DETAIL THAT
3 YOU WERE ABLE TO MAKE A DETERMINATION THE CARD ITSELF,
4 THE LATENT, THE UNKNOWN HAD ENOUGH RIDGE DETAIL,
5 CORRECT?
6 A YES.
7 Q IN YOUR OPINION.
8 NUMBER 7. THAT WAS ALSO ONE YOU SAID
9 EXCLUDED MR. WHITNEY, EXCLUDED MR. CHEUNG, BUT WAS
10 INCONCLUSIVE AS TO MR. WONG, CORRECT?
11 A CORRECT.
12 Q SAME QUESTION FOR THAT ONE AS NUMBER 5. DO
13 YOU KNOW WHY IT WAS INCONCLUSIVE? WAS IT HIS ENTIRE
14 EXEMPLAR, HIS ENTIRE PRINT THAT THEY TOOK, OR WAS IT
15 JUST A PART OF THAT?
16 A I DON'T KNOW.
17 Q BUT IN NUMBER 7 THERE WAS ENOUGH RIDGE DETAIL
18 TO MAKE A DETERMINATION OF SOME SORT ON THE UNKNOWN
19 PRINT?
20 A YES.
21 Q MR. WHITNEY'S EXEMPLAR -- WHEN I SAY
22 EXEMPLAR. COULD YOU TELL ME WHAT YOU BELIEVE I MEAN BY
23 THAT?
24 THE COURT: WELL, THAT'S IRRELEVANT. SHE DOESN'T
25 HAVE TO TRY TO FIGURE OUT WHAT YOU MEAN.
26 MS. PETROSINO: SURE.
? 710
1 BY MS. PETROSINO:
2 Q I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE ON THE SAME
3 PAGE WHEN I WAS SAYING EXEMPLAR, SO WHAT DO YOU MEAN
4 WHEN YOU SAY EXEMPLAR?
5 A I MEAN A FINGERPRINT CARD THAT WAS
6 DELIBERATELY TAKEN AND WHO WE KNOW THE DONOR IS.
7 Q OKAY. AND USING THAT DEFINITION, WAS THERE
8 ANYTHING ABOUT THE EXEMPLAR OF MR. WHITNEY THAT WAS
9 INCONCLUSIVE ITSELF?
10 A THERE'S NO INDICATION ON ANY OF MY CASE NOTES
11 THAT INDICATES THAT THERE WERE INCONCLUSIVE RESULTS TO
12 MR. WHITNEY.
13 Q AND THAT WAS PROBABLY -- WELL ACTUALLY THAT
14 ANSWERS THE QUESTION.
15 WERE MR. WHITNEY'S PRINTS, THE EXEMPLARS THAT
16 WERE TAKEN, WERE THEY OF SUFFICIENT QUALITY THAT YOU
17 COULD USE THEM TO MAKE ASSESSMENTS?
18 A YES.
19 Q OKAY. THE CARD THAT YOU LOOKED AT FROM THE
20 LATENTS, THE UNKNOWNS FROM THE VEHICLE, YOU DON'T GET
21 THE INFORMATION AS TO WHOSE VEHICLE THAT IS, DO YOU?
22 A THAT IS CORRECT.
23 Q YOU'RE JUST LOOKING AT THE PRINTS, CORRECT?
24 A YES.
25 MS. PETROSINO: THANK YOU. I HAVE NOTHING FURTHER.
26 THE COURT: REDIRECT.
? 711
1 REDIRECT EXAMINATION ^
2 BY MR. MURPHY:
3 Q THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
4 MS. DAHER, REGARDING LATENT LIFT NUMBER 2,
5 CAN YOU REFRESH MY MEMORY ON THAT.
6 THE COURT: WELL, HOLD ON. THAT'S IRRELEVANT.
7 SHE DOESN'T HAVE TO REFRESH YOUR MEMORY.
8 BY MR. MURPHY:
9 Q OKAY. IF I COULD HAVE JUST ONE MOMENT, YOUR
10 HONOR.
11 THE COURT: OKAY.
12 BY MR. MURPHY:
13 Q THE MASTER BEDROOM DOORJAMB, LATENT LIFT
14 NUMBER 2, WHAT WAS THE RESULT OF THE COMPARISON OF THAT
15 PRINT?
16 A LATENT LIFT NUMBER 2 WAS IDENTIFIED AS THE
17 LEFT PALM OF MR. WHITNEY.
18 Q OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO WERE ANY OF THE PRINTS
19 MADE TO MR. WONG?
20 A NO.
21 Q WHY IS THAT? YOU TESTIFIED THERE ARE
22 SOMETIMES PROBLEMS WHEN EXEMPLARS ARE TAKEN FROM PEOPLE
23 IN THE MORGUE. WHY IS THAT?
24 MS. PETROSINO: OBJECTION. ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN
25 -- LACKS FOUNDATION.
26 THE COURT: WELL IT'S IRRELEVANT AS TO EVERYONE
? 712
1 ELSE. IF YOU WANT TO ASK HER WHAT THE PROBLEMS WERE
2 WITH MR. WONG'S PRINTS, THAT'S FINE.
3 BY MR. MURPHY:
4 Q OKAY. WHAT WERE THE PROBLEMS WITH MR. WONG'S
5 PRINTS?
6 A THEY MAY HAVE LACKED CLARITY IN CERTAIN
7 AREAS. THERE MAY HAVE BEEN SMUDGING AS A RESULT OF THE
8 RIGIDITY OF THE FINGERS, AND THE DIFFICULTY IN TAKING
9 INKED EXEMPLARS FROM A DECEASED PERSON.
10 Q OKAY. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE DIFFICULTY
11 IN TAKING INKED EXEMPLARS FROM A DECEASED PERSON?
12 A YES, I AM.
13 Q WHAT ARE THOSE DIFFICULTIES?
14 A THEY ARE -- HANDS ARE VERY RIGID, AND IT'S
15 VERY DIFFICULT TO OFTEN TIMES GET THE FINGERS TO BECOME
16 FLEXIBLE ENOUGH TO RETAIN A GOOD INKED IMPRESSION
17 BECAUSE THEY'RE OFTEN TIMES VERY CLAW LIKE, AND EVEN
18 THEIR HANDS SOMETIMES ARE CLOSED. AND SO IN ORDER TO
19 GET INSIDE, WE HAVE TO PULL THEIR FINGERS APART AND
20 BREAK THE RIGOR IN THE FINGERS AND TRY AND INK THE
21 PRINTS AND THEN DEPOSIT THOSE PRINTS CLEARLY ON A PAPER
22 SURFACE OF SOME KIND.
23 Q WHAT IS RIGOR?
24 A RIGOR OCCURS WHEN THE JOINTS ARE BEING FIXED
25 AFTER DEATH.
26 MR. MURPHY: THANK YOU. I HAVE NOTHING FURTHER.
? 713
1 THE COURT: RECROSS.
2 MS. PETROSINO: NO. THANK YOU.
3 THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. YOU MAY STEP DOWN.