Murder: Difference between revisions
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Mens Rea (Culpable Mental State) is also required in order for a defendant to be found guilty of murder. THe following mental states will satisfy the mens rea requirement for Murder. | Mens Rea (Culpable Mental State) is also required in order for a defendant to be found guilty of murder. THe following mental states will satisfy the mens rea requirement for Murder. | ||
* '''Malice Aforethought''' - Not a distinct mens rea, Malice Aforethought is legal concept that encompasses many different mental states. | * '''Malice Aforethought''' - Not a distinct mens rea, Malice Aforethought is legal concept that encompasses many different mental states. | ||
* '''Intent''' | * '''Intent to Kill''' | ||
* '''Intent to do Serious Bodily Harm''' | |||
* '''Depraved Heart Murder''' - The mens rea may be satisifed under this theory if the defendant acted in a way that demonstrated reckless indifference to human life. | |||
==Absence of Justification== | ==Absence of Justification== | ||
Revision as of 13:32, 5 August 2010
Background
Murder can be generally defined as 1) the taking of life, 2) by conduct of the defendant 3) with a requisite mens rea and 4) an absence of justification. There must also be sufficient proof of death. This is sometimes referred to as the corpus delecti requirement.
Taking of Life
In order for murder to have occurred, a life must exist. Two factual scenarios arise in which this element is in question.
First, when an individual kills a foetus, has the taking of life occured? The answer to this question may depend on the jurisidiction in which the murder takes place. Early courts refused to recognize a foetus as a life.[1] In response to these cases several states either broadened the definition of murder to include a foetus or created a separate crime of foetal homicide. Interestingly, the viability of the foetus may not even be an issue in some of these jurisdictions. In some cases, this issue has been dealt with as one of transferred intent.
Second, is the defendant responsible for murder if the person is already dead when the defendant's conduct occured. Death is generally defined by either lack of heartbeat or lack of brain activity. This may be an issue in simultaneous death where the sequence of death changes the lines of inheritance. It should be noted here that the shooting of a corpse cannot be murder. However it could potentially be attempted murder or even abuse of corpse in some jurisdictions.
Conduct of the Defendant
In order for the crime of murder to have occured, the defendant engage in some conduct or actus reus that causes the death. Such conduct can either be an affirmative act (firing a weapon) or an ommission (failure to provide food to kidnapping victim). The issue of whether the conduct is sufficiently connected to the death may arise in certain circumstances. For instance, if a doctor provides an individual with sleeping pills knowing that the individual intends to use them to commit suicide, are they liable for murder? Courts may differ, however several have stated that the defendant is not liable for murder on an assisted suicide theory. [2]
Mens Rea
Mens Rea (Culpable Mental State) is also required in order for a defendant to be found guilty of murder. THe following mental states will satisfy the mens rea requirement for Murder.
- Malice Aforethought - Not a distinct mens rea, Malice Aforethought is legal concept that encompasses many different mental states.
- Intent to Kill
- Intent to do Serious Bodily Harm
- Depraved Heart Murder - The mens rea may be satisifed under this theory if the defendant acted in a way that demonstrated reckless indifference to human life.
Absence of Justification
Corpus Delecti
Literally, "Body of the Crime" in Latin, the Corpus Delecti does not require the production of a physical body as an element of proof that the crime of murder has been committed. Proof of death, like any other element of the crime, can be proven through circumstantial evidence.
