Mental Incapacity: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Defense Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Ddemetriou (talk | contribs)
Created page with 'Under this defense, the lawyer argues that the defendant lacked the capacity to distinguish right from wrong or to understand the likely consequences of his/her actions Examples �'
 
No edit summary
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Under this defense, the lawyer argues that the defendant lacked the capacity to distinguish right from wrong or to understand the likely consequences of his/her actions
Under this defense, the lawyer argues that the defendant lacked the capacity to distinguish right from wrong or to understand the likely consequences of his/her actions.
 
Examples of incapacity include:
Examples of incapacity include:


* Insanity- The defendant was mentally incapable of telling right from wrong
*[[Insanity Defense]]
* Infancy- The defendant was too young to be held criminally liable for the crime
 
* Diminished responsibility- The defendant was mentally incapable of the intent required for the crime
*[[Diminished Capacity Defense]]
 
*[[Infancy Defense]]
 
 
----
See [[Defenses]]

Latest revision as of 14:42, 12 November 2010

Under this defense, the lawyer argues that the defendant lacked the capacity to distinguish right from wrong or to understand the likely consequences of his/her actions.

Examples of incapacity include:



See Defenses