Evidence - Revision history

IBJadmin at 08:29, 4 April 2013

2013-04-04T08:29:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:29, 4 April 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Languages\|Evidence}}

	Rules of evidence are created to assist in the search for truth and promote a fair process for both parties. This is to ensure that they have both had their day in court by making the best possible presentation to their case. Rules of evidence are the most important in common law criminal justice systems which retain the jury system, since it is thought that these rules safeguard against jury's giving inappropriate weight to certain types of evidence. As the state has far greater resources (i.e. advantage) than the Defense, the Prosecution has a duty to make pre-trial disclosure to even out the playing field. Certain rules of evidence also provide a deterrent effect against prosecutorial or police misconduct, improve efficiency in the administration of justice. Finally, other rules, like rules of privilege, are intended to affect out-of-court behavior. Evidence should be [[Materiality, Relevance, and Admissibility of Evidence \| material and relevant]].		Rules of evidence are created to assist in the search for truth and promote a fair process for both parties. This is to ensure that they have both had their day in court by making the best possible presentation to their case. Rules of evidence are the most important in common law criminal justice systems which retain the jury system, since it is thought that these rules safeguard against jury's giving inappropriate weight to certain types of evidence. As the state has far greater resources (i.e. advantage) than the Defense, the Prosecution has a duty to make pre-trial disclosure to even out the playing field. Certain rules of evidence also provide a deterrent effect against prosecutorial or police misconduct, improve efficiency in the administration of justice. Finally, other rules, like rules of privilege, are intended to affect out-of-court behavior. Evidence should be [[Materiality, Relevance, and Admissibility of Evidence \| material and relevant]].

Jfischer at 12:31, 19 November 2012

2012-11-19T12:31:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:31, 19 November 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:
	**[[GPS Evidence and the Fourth Amendment \| GPS Evidence]]		**[[GPS Evidence and the Fourth Amendment \| GPS Evidence]]
	**Handwriting Analysis		**Handwriting Analysis
	**Lie Detectors		**[[Lie Detectors]]
	**Toolmarks		**Toolmarks

IBJadmin at 10:02, 3 August 2012

2012-08-03T10:02:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 3 August 2012
Line 68:		Line 68:
	**Circumstantial documentary evidence: a dog license in your neighbor's name		**Circumstantial documentary evidence: a dog license in your neighbor's name
	**Circumstantial: dog hair found on your neighbor's sofa		**Circumstantial: dog hair found on your neighbor's sofa
			*Remember that some sorts of evidence could fall into more than one category.

	* '''Judicial notice''' is evidence that the court declares is proven through authority or common knowledge. When judicial notice is taken, there is no need to call any evidence: the judicial notice replaces it. Basically, it consists in asking the court to take as truth a particular fact that counsel is proposing. Proof that reference is authoritative is usually required. The rationale for judicial notice is cost and efficiency. Judicial notice has to be relevan to a matter in issue. However judicial notice is a matter of discretion. Courts are more likely to take judicial notice of legislative facts (e.g. when interpreting statutes) than adjudicative facts (i.e. material facts). Courts take more judicial notice of facts in sentencing.		* '''Judicial notice''' is evidence that the court declares is proven through authority or common knowledge. When judicial notice is taken, there is no need to call any evidence: the judicial notice replaces it. Basically, it consists in asking the court to take as truth a particular fact that counsel is proposing. Proof that reference is authoritative is usually required. The rationale for judicial notice is cost and efficiency. Judicial notice has to be relevan to a matter in issue. However judicial notice is a matter of discretion. Courts are more likely to take judicial notice of legislative facts (e.g. when interpreting statutes) than adjudicative facts (i.e. material facts). Courts take more judicial notice of facts in sentencing.

IBJadmin at 10:02, 3 August 2012

2012-08-03T10:02:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 3 August 2012
Line 61:		Line 61:
	***The jury (trier of fact) determines the weight: ''should'' the inference be drawn.		***The jury (trier of fact) determines the weight: ''should'' the inference be drawn.
	* '''Circumstantial evidence''' is evidence which indirectly, through inference, aids the trier of fact in inferring the existence of a fact in issue. For example, fingerprints or DNA found at the scene would be circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence can be more reliable than direct evidence.		* '''Circumstantial evidence''' is evidence which indirectly, through inference, aids the trier of fact in inferring the existence of a fact in issue. For example, fingerprints or DNA found at the scene would be circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence can be more reliable than direct evidence.

			'''Examples''' of evidence:
			*There is a "no pets" rule in your apartment building, but you think your neighbor keeps a dog in his apartment. In order to prove this, you want to present the following evidence:
			**Direct testimonial evidence: a witness saying "I saw the dog" - evidence that there was a dog in the apartment, but not necessarily that the dog belonged to your neighbor
			**Direct real evidence: a picture of the dog with your neighbor in the apartment
			**Circumstantial documentary evidence: a dog license in your neighbor's name
			**Circumstantial: dog hair found on your neighbor's sofa

	* '''Judicial notice''' is evidence that the court declares is proven through authority or common knowledge. When judicial notice is taken, there is no need to call any evidence: the judicial notice replaces it. Basically, it consists in asking the court to take as truth a particular fact that counsel is proposing. Proof that reference is authoritative is usually required. The rationale for judicial notice is cost and efficiency. Judicial notice has to be relevan to a matter in issue. However judicial notice is a matter of discretion. Courts are more likely to take judicial notice of legislative facts (e.g. when interpreting statutes) than adjudicative facts (i.e. material facts). Courts take more judicial notice of facts in sentencing.		* '''Judicial notice''' is evidence that the court declares is proven through authority or common knowledge. When judicial notice is taken, there is no need to call any evidence: the judicial notice replaces it. Basically, it consists in asking the court to take as truth a particular fact that counsel is proposing. Proof that reference is authoritative is usually required. The rationale for judicial notice is cost and efficiency. Judicial notice has to be relevan to a matter in issue. However judicial notice is a matter of discretion. Courts are more likely to take judicial notice of legislative facts (e.g. when interpreting statutes) than adjudicative facts (i.e. material facts). Courts take more judicial notice of facts in sentencing.
	Judicial notice of facts occurs when:		Judicial notice of facts occurs when:

IBJadmin at 09:58, 3 August 2012

2012-08-03T09:58:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:58, 3 August 2012
Line 56:		Line 56:
	There are various types of evidence that a defense attorney will encounter during a case:		There are various types of evidence that a defense attorney will encounter during a case:
	* '''Direct evidence''' is evidence which, if true, proves a relevant fact conclusively. For example, eyewitness testimony is a type of direct evidence. Direct evidence is not necessarily more reliable than any other kind of evidence. See, [[Eyewitness Misidentification]]. Direct evidence establishes a material fact without the need for any inferences to be drawn by the trier of fact.		* '''Direct evidence''' is evidence which, if true, proves a relevant fact conclusively. For example, eyewitness testimony is a type of direct evidence. Direct evidence is not necessarily more reliable than any other kind of evidence. See, [[Eyewitness Misidentification]]. Direct evidence establishes a material fact without the need for any inferences to be drawn by the trier of fact.
			**If only one fact can be drawn from the evidence, then the jury (trier of fact) will make that conclusion.
			**If more than one fact can be drawn, the judge (trier of law) must determine which inferences are possible.
			***The judge (trier of law) determines the relevance: ''could'' the inference be drawn.
			***The jury (trier of fact) determines the weight: ''should'' the inference be drawn.
	* '''Circumstantial evidence''' is evidence which indirectly, through inference, aids the trier of fact in inferring the existence of a fact in issue. For example, fingerprints or DNA found at the scene would be circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence can be more reliable than direct evidence.		* '''Circumstantial evidence''' is evidence which indirectly, through inference, aids the trier of fact in inferring the existence of a fact in issue. For example, fingerprints or DNA found at the scene would be circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence can be more reliable than direct evidence.
	* '''Judicial notice''' is evidence that the court declares is proven through authority or common knowledge. When judicial notice is taken, there is no need to call any evidence: the judicial notice replaces it. Basically, it consists in asking the court to take as truth a particular fact that counsel is proposing. Proof that reference is authoritative is usually required. The rationale for judicial notice is cost and efficiency. Judicial notice has to be relevan to a matter in issue. However judicial notice is a matter of discretion. Courts are more likely to take judicial notice of legislative facts (e.g. when interpreting statutes) than adjudicative facts (i.e. material facts). Courts take more judicial notice of facts in sentencing.		* '''Judicial notice''' is evidence that the court declares is proven through authority or common knowledge. When judicial notice is taken, there is no need to call any evidence: the judicial notice replaces it. Basically, it consists in asking the court to take as truth a particular fact that counsel is proposing. Proof that reference is authoritative is usually required. The rationale for judicial notice is cost and efficiency. Judicial notice has to be relevan to a matter in issue. However judicial notice is a matter of discretion. Courts are more likely to take judicial notice of legislative facts (e.g. when interpreting statutes) than adjudicative facts (i.e. material facts). Courts take more judicial notice of facts in sentencing.

IBJadmin at 09:54, 3 August 2012

2012-08-03T09:54:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:54, 3 August 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Rules of evidence are created to assist in the search for truth and promote a fair process for both parties. This is to ensure that they have both had their day in court by making the best possible presentation to their case. Rules of evidence are the most important in common law criminal justice systems which retain the jury system, since it is thought that these rules safeguard against jury's giving inappropriate weight to certain types of evidence. As the state has far greater resources (i.e. advantage) than the Defense, the Prosecution has a duty to make pre-trial disclosure to even out the playing field. Certain rules of evidence also provide a deterrent effect against prosecutorial or police misconduct, improve efficiency in the administration of justice. Finally, other rules, like rules of privilege, are intended to affect out-of-court behavior. Evidence should be [[Materiality, Relevance, and Admissibility of Evidence \| ~~Material~~ and ~~Relevant~~]].		Rules of evidence are created to assist in the search for truth and promote a fair process for both parties. This is to ensure that they have both had their day in court by making the best possible presentation to their case. Rules of evidence are the most important in common law criminal justice systems which retain the jury system, since it is thought that these rules safeguard against jury's giving inappropriate weight to certain types of evidence. As the state has far greater resources (i.e. advantage) than the Defense, the Prosecution has a duty to make pre-trial disclosure to even out the playing field. Certain rules of evidence also provide a deterrent effect against prosecutorial or police misconduct, improve efficiency in the administration of justice. Finally, other rules, like rules of privilege, are intended to affect out-of-court behavior. Evidence should be [[Materiality, Relevance, and Admissibility of Evidence \| material and relevant]].

	Some evidence, even if material, relevant, and unprejudicial, may still be inadmissible if it was [[Exclusionary Rule \| obtained in an illegal manner]].		Some evidence, even if material, relevant, and unprejudicial, may still be inadmissible if it was [[Exclusionary Rule \| obtained in an illegal manner]].

IBJadmin: /* Types of Evidence */

2012-07-09T13:39:25Z

Types of Evidence

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 9 July 2012
Line 46:		Line 46:
	**[[Expert Witnesses]]		**[[Expert Witnesses]]
	**[[Hearsay]]		**[[Hearsay]]
	**Reputation and Opinion		**[[Reputation and Opinion]]
	**Similar Facts Evidence		**Similar Facts Evidence

IBJadmin: /* Types of Evidence */

2012-07-09T08:18:45Z

Types of Evidence

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:18, 9 July 2012
Line 41:		Line 41:
	**[[Witnesses]]		**[[Witnesses]]
	**[[Competency to Testify]]		**[[Competency to Testify]]
			**[[Examination of Witnesses]]
	**[[Confessions]]		**[[Confessions]]
	**[[Depositions]]		**[[Depositions]]

IBJadmin: /* Types of Evidence */

2012-07-02T09:47:48Z

Types of Evidence

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:47, 2 July 2012
Line 39:		Line 39:
	**Prior Bad Acts		**Prior Bad Acts
	*Testimonial Evidence		*Testimonial Evidence
			**[[Witnesses]]
	**[[Competency to Testify]]		**[[Competency to Testify]]
	**[[Confessions]]		**[[Confessions]]

IBJadmin at 08:00, 2 July 2012

2012-07-02T08:00:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:00, 2 July 2012
Line 55:		Line 55:
	* '''Direct evidence''' is evidence which, if true, proves a relevant fact conclusively. For example, eyewitness testimony is a type of direct evidence. Direct evidence is not necessarily more reliable than any other kind of evidence. See, [[Eyewitness Misidentification]]. Direct evidence establishes a material fact without the need for any inferences to be drawn by the trier of fact.		* '''Direct evidence''' is evidence which, if true, proves a relevant fact conclusively. For example, eyewitness testimony is a type of direct evidence. Direct evidence is not necessarily more reliable than any other kind of evidence. See, [[Eyewitness Misidentification]]. Direct evidence establishes a material fact without the need for any inferences to be drawn by the trier of fact.
	* '''Circumstantial evidence''' is evidence which indirectly, through inference, aids the trier of fact in inferring the existence of a fact in issue. For example, fingerprints or DNA found at the scene would be circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence can be more reliable than direct evidence.		* '''Circumstantial evidence''' is evidence which indirectly, through inference, aids the trier of fact in inferring the existence of a fact in issue. For example, fingerprints or DNA found at the scene would be circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence can be more reliable than direct evidence.
	* '''Judicial notice''' is evidence that the court declares is proven through authority or common knowledge.		* '''Judicial notice''' is evidence that the court declares is proven through authority or common knowledge. When judicial notice is taken, there is no need to call any evidence: the judicial notice replaces it. Basically, it consists in asking the court to take as truth a particular fact that counsel is proposing. Proof that reference is authoritative is usually required. The rationale for judicial notice is cost and efficiency. Judicial notice has to be relevan to a matter in issue. However judicial notice is a matter of discretion. Courts are more likely to take judicial notice of legislative facts (e.g. when interpreting statutes) than adjudicative facts (i.e. material facts). Courts take more judicial notice of facts in sentencing.
			Judicial notice of facts occurs when:

			- Common fund of knowledge (e.g.: high-heeled shoes are fashionable but unstable ; cost of child-rearing).

			- Local areas have common understanding or common knowledge (e.g.: impaired driving in a community).

			- A group of persons have common knowledge (e.g.: picket line = barrier to union members and sympathizers ; cost of child-rearing).

			The threshold for judicial notice is strict: a court may properly take judicial notice of facts that are so notorious or generally accepter as not to be the subject of debate among reasonable persons or capable of immediate and accurate demonstration by resort to readily accessible sources of indisputable accuracy (e.g.: dictionaries, scientific treatises or principles ; see Olson v. Olson).
	* '''Real evidence''' is some actual physical item involved in the case. For example, the murder weapon is real evidence. This evidence needs to be related directly to the case by testimony and its condition established.		* '''Real evidence''' is some actual physical item involved in the case. For example, the murder weapon is real evidence. This evidence needs to be related directly to the case by testimony and its condition established.
	* '''Demonstrative evidence''' is a depiction, prepared for trial, that represents an item involved in the case. Following are some examples of demonstrative evidence: photo of the murder weapon, surveillance camera footage, computer simulations, diagrams, maps, x-rays, videotape, illustrations or any other item specifically created for trial.		* '''Demonstrative evidence''' is a depiction, prepared for trial, that represents an item involved in the case. Following are some examples of demonstrative evidence: photo of the murder weapon, surveillance camera footage, computer simulations, diagrams, maps, x-rays, videotape, illustrations or any other item specifically created for trial.